Dermatologic Surgery

<jats:sec>
            <jats:title>BACKGROUND</jats:title>
            <jats:p>Skin laxity and crepiness of the arms is a cosmetic concern that before the advent of noninvasive skin tightening technologies could only be treated with surgery. Ultrasound-based technologies deliver energy to the dermis which causes neocollagenesis and neoelastogenesis to rejuvenate the skin.</jats:p>
          </jats:sec>
          <jats:sec>
            <jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title>
            <jats:p>This study evaluates and compares the efficacy of a high-intensity, parallel beam ultrasound-based skin tightening (HIUS) device with microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) for improvement of upper arm skin laxity and crepiness.</jats:p>
          </jats:sec>
          <jats:sec>
            <jats:title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</jats:title>
            <jats:p>A prospective, single-center, blinded, split-body, randomized clinical study investigated HIUS and MFU-V for improvement of upper arm skin laxity and crepiness. Subjects received a single treatment to the upper arms.</jats:p>
          </jats:sec>
          <jats:sec>
            <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title>
            <jats:p>Fourteen female subjects completed the study. Assessments compared Day 30 and Day 90 follow-up visits with baseline. HIUS was as effective as MFU-V in improving arm laxity and crepiness. Investigators and subjects rated improved arm laxity/crepiness at Day 90. Most subjects were satisfied with the improvement of arm laxity/crepiness. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores observed between the HIUS and MFU-V. The MFU-V treatment took more time to perform than the HIUS treatment.</jats:p>
          </jats:sec>
          <jats:sec>
            <jats:title>CONCLUSION</jats:title>
            <jats:p>High-intensity, parallel beam ultrasound-based skin tightening was effective and delivered results with high patient satisfaction for improving upper arm skin laxity/crepiness.</jats:p>
          </jats:sec>

Rejuvenation of the aging arm: multimodal combination therapy for optimal results

Dermatol Surg

Subdermal radiofrequency for skin tightening of the posterior upper arms

Radiesse(®): a novel rejuvenation treatment for the upper arms

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol

Diluted calcium hydroxylapatite for skin tightening of the upper arms and abdomen

J Drugs Dermatol

Skin tightening of aging upper arms using an infrared light device

Poly-L-lactic acid for nonfacial skin laxity

Single treatment protocol with microneedle fractional radiofrequency for treatment of body skin laxity and fat deposits

Lasers Surg Med

Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound

Single-plane versus dual-plane microfocused ultrasound with visualization in the treatment of upper arm skin laxity: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial

Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device

Clinical applications of radiofrequency: nonsurgical skin tightening (thermage)

Clin Plast Surg

Unconventional use of ablative fractional photothermolysis in arm contouring

J Cosmet Laser Ther

Efficacy and safety of high-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams for fine lines and wrinkles

The efficacy and safety of the high-intensity parallel beam ultrasound device at the depth of 1.5 mm for skin tightening

J Cosmet Dermatol

Eyebrow lifting from high-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams

High-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams for submental lifting

Efficacy and safety of high-intensity, high-frequency, non-focused ultrasound parallel beams for facial skin laxity

High-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams for cellulite of the buttocks and thighs

Skin laxity and crepiness of the arms is a cosmetic concern that before the advent of noninvasive skin tightening technologies could only be treated with surgery. Ultrasound-based technologies deliver energy to the dermis which causes neocollagenesis and neoelastogenesis to rejuvenate the skin.
This study evaluates and compares the efficacy of a high-intensity, parallel beam ultrasound-based skin tightening (HIUS) device with microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) for improvement of upper arm skin laxity and crepiness.
A prospective, single-center, blinded, split-body, randomized clinical study investigated HIUS and MFU-V for improvement of upper arm skin laxity and crepiness. Subjects received a single treatment to the upper arms.
Fourteen female subjects completed the study. Assessments compared Day 30 and Day 90 follow-up visits with baseline. HIUS was as effective as MFU-V in improving arm laxity and crepiness. Investigators and subjects rated improved arm laxity/crepiness at Day 90. Most subjects were satisfied with the improvement of arm laxity/crepiness. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores observed between the HIUS and MFU-V. The MFU-V treatment took more time to perform than the HIUS treatment.
High-intensity, parallel beam ultrasound-based skin tightening was effective and delivered results with high patient satisfaction for improving upper arm skin laxity/crepiness.

A Single-Center, Blinded, Split-Body, Randomized Clinical Trial of High-Intensity, Parallel Ultrasound Beams Versus Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for the Treatment of Upper Inner Arm Skin Laxity.

A Single-Center, Blinded, Split-Body, Randomized Clinical Trial of High-Intensity, Parallel Ultrasound Beams Versus Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for the Treatment of Upper Inner Arm Skin Laxity

A Single-Center, Blinded, Split-Body, Randomized Clinical Trial of High-Intensity, Parallel Ultrasound Beams Versus Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for the Treatment of Upper Inner Arm Skin Laxity

Clinical Summary

What was studied

Key findings

Study limitations

Clinical implications

Related Questions