ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Treadmill Stress Test in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Treadmill Stress Test in Patients With A…

Treadmill Stress Test in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

JAMA Cardiology·July 22Open Access
Cardiac & Cardiovascular SystemsPractice changingAortic StenosisProspective Registry (Prespecified Sub-Study Of Randomized Controlled Trial)Exercise Stress TestingTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementOlder AdultTAVR

Summary

View source

What was studied

This prespecified registry of the EARLY TAVR trial evaluated the safety of treadmill stress testing (TST), 2-year clinical outcomes, and rates of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 105 apparently asymptomatic patients with severe AS who had a positive TST result, across 75 US sites (July 2017–December 2021).

Key findings

TST was safe (no deaths, syncope, or cardioversions). At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 5.7% (Kaplan-Meier). AVR rates were 79.9% at 1 year and 85.9% at 2 years — meaning ~20% of patients with a positive TST (and a guideline indication for prompt treatment) remained untreated at 1 year. Predictors of a positive TST included higher peak velocity, lower ejection fraction, prior CABG, and prior stroke.

Study limitations

Only 105 of 146 eligible patients with a positive TST consented to enroll, introducing potential selection bias. The registry is observational with no randomized comparator for outcomes in TST-positive patients. Reasons for delayed or absent AVR despite a positive TST were not described.

Clinical implications

TST is safe in asymptomatic severe AS and unmasked an AVR indication in ~15% of screened patients — reinforcing its routine use in this population. Clinicians should note that a positive TST warrants prompt referral for AVR, as 1 in 5 such patients in this registry still had not received treatment at 1 year.

Caveats

  • Only 105 of 146 patients with a positive TST enrolled, which may limit generalizability of outcome data.
  • The 'brand' tag for TAVR is used as a device class rather than a proprietary brand name; no single manufacturer's device was exclusively studied.
  • The study design is labeled 'Randomized Controlled Trial' in PubMed MeSH terms (reflecting the parent EARLY TAVR trial), but this specific analysis is a prospective registry sub-study — not a randomized comparison; level of evidence assigned accordingly.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

When should I order a treadmill stress test in a patient with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis?What are the current guidelines for early TAVR versus surveillance in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis?What predicts symptom development on exercise testing in asymptomatic aortic stenosis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Cardiology
Sample Size
n=105
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next