ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Trends in Hockey-Related Ocular Trauma

Trends in Hockey-Related Ocular Trauma

JAMA Ophthalmology·July 23Open Access
OphthalmologySafety signalOcular TraumaSports-Related Eye InjuryCross-Sectional StudyMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This cross-sectional study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to characterize US hockey-related ocular trauma — including injury type, severity, and demographics — from January 2004 to December 2023.

Key findings

215 NEISS cases extrapolated to ~6,466 US hockey eye injuries over 20 years; 12% of 259 diagnoses were vision-threatening, protective goggles were reported in only 2% of cases, and 83% of injuries were equipment-related. Pediatric patients (<18 years, 69% of cases) had more minor anterior segment injuries (64% vs 46%, P=.02), while adults had more major posterior segment injuries (6% vs 0%, P=.009).

Study limitations

- NEISS captures only ED visits, likely underestimating true incidence (clinic- or office-treated injuries are missed). - Small sample (n=215) limits statistical power for subgroup analyses. - Goggle use was self-reported and may be further underreported in this dataset.

Clinical implications

Only 2% of injured hockey players wore protective goggles — clinicians and team staff should actively counsel players of all ages and hockey types to wear certified eye protection. Prompt, thorough ocular and periorbital assessment is warranted given that 12% of diagnoses were vision-threatening.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What protective eyewear standards are recommended for youth hockey players?How do hockey eye injury rates compare to other contact sports?What is the management approach for vision-threatening anterior segment trauma in the ED?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Ophthalmology
Sample Size
n=215
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next