ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Eltrombopag Added to…

Eltrombopag Added to Standard Immunosuppressive Treatment as Front‐Line Therapy for Severe Aplastic Anemia: Long‐Term Outcomes of the Phase‐3 Randomized Superiority EBMT ‐ SAAWP RACE Study

American Journal of Hematology·July 19Open Access
HematologyPractice changingSevere Aplastic AnemiaRandomized Controlled TrialImmunosuppressive TherapyThrombopoietin Receptor AgonistMixedRevoladeCyclosporineEltrombopagHorse Antithymocyte Globulin

Summary

View source

What was studied

The RACE trial (phase III RCT) compared standard IST (hATG + cyclosporine A) alone (arm A, n=101) versus standard IST plus eltrombopag 150 mg/day from day +14 (arm B, n=96) as front-line therapy in 197 treatment-naive severe aplastic anemia patients, with a median follow-up of 23.2 months.

Key findings

Adding eltrombopag significantly improved 2-year complete response (62.4% vs. 35.3%, p<0.001), disease-free survival (56% vs. 37%, adjusted HR 0.49, p<0.001), and event-free survival (48% vs. 32%, adjusted HR 0.54, p<0.001). Overall survival trended better (91% vs. 86%, p=0.081). Clonal evolution was rare (1 vs. 2 patients), and evolution to clinical PNH was lower in arm B (1% vs. 8%, p=0.041).

Study limitations

Overall survival difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.081), limiting conclusions on survival benefit. Eltrombopag was started at day +14, so the schedule used may not generalize to other dosing strategies. The study was not powered to detect rare clonal evolution events.

Clinical implications

Adding eltrombopag to hATG + cyclosporine as front-line therapy for severe aplastic anemia roughly doubles complete response rates and meaningfully improves disease-free and event-free survival at 2 years without increasing risk of secondary myeloid malignancies. Clinicians can use this combination with confidence in treatment-naive patients.

Caveats

  • Age distribution of the 197 patients is not detailed in the abstract; 'mixed' age group is inferred from typical SAA trial enrollment patterns.
  • Overall survival difference (86% vs. 91%) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.081); the survival benefit should be interpreted cautiously.
  • The brand name 'Revolade' (EU) is used; the US brand name is 'Promacta'. Both refer to eltrombopag.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the current role of eltrombopag in front-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia?How does hATG plus cyclosporine compare to bone marrow transplant for severe aplastic anemia in adults?What is the risk of clonal evolution or MDS after immunosuppressive therapy for aplastic anemia?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Hematology
Sample Size
n=197
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next