ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Complement Activation Linked to Type II Interferon Signaling in Still Disease
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Complement Activation Linked to Type…

Complement Activation Linked to Type II Interferon Signaling in Still Disease

Arthritis & Rheumatology·September 16Open Access
RheumatologyPractice changingJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisMacrophage Activation SyndromeStill DiseaseCross-Sectional Study With In Vitro ExperimentsComplement PathwayInterferon SignalingMixedInterferon Gamma

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study assessed complement activation in Still disease (SD) using transcriptomics, proteomics, and in vitro methods across patients with active SD, inactive SD, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and healthy donors, examining links between complement and type II interferon (IFN-γ) signaling.

Key findings

Monocytes from SD-onset patients showed marked enrichment of the complement cascade vs. remission patients (adjusted P = 3.7 × 10⁻³⁶); active SD had elevated C1q, C3a, C5a, and terminal complement complex levels, with C1QB/C1QC expression correlating with IFN-γ markers (IL-18, CXCL9, CXCL10), and a feed-forward loop was identified where IFN-γ induces monocytic C1q and C1q in turn enhances IFN-γ production by CD8+ T cells.

Study limitations

Macrophage activation syndrome subgroup was very small (n = 2), limiting conclusions for that phenotype; the study is largely observational and cross-sectional, so causality of the C1q–IFN-γ loop in human disease cannot be fully established; in vitro findings may not fully recapitulate the in vivo inflammatory milieu.

Clinical implications

Complement activation, particularly via C1q and the classical pathway, is a feature of active Still disease linked to IFN-γ signaling—clinicians should be aware that complement and IFN-γ pathways may act together, potentially informing future therapeutic targets in SD.

Caveats

  • The feed-forward loop between C1q and IFN-γ was demonstrated in vitro; whether this loop drives clinical disease activity in vivo requires further validation
  • The JIA comparator group was large (n > 600 for NanoString) but heterogeneous in disease subtype, which may introduce confounding
  • The MAS subgroup included only 2 patients, making any MAS-specific conclusions unreliable

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the role of IFN-gamma in Still disease and macrophage activation syndrome?Are complement inhibitors being studied as treatments for autoinflammatory diseases like Still disease?How does C1q relate to disease activity in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Sample Size
n=230
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next