ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Redefining functional high‐risk multiple…

Redefining functional high‐risk multiple myeloma in the context of upfront quadruplet therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

Cancer·July 20Open Access
OncologyPractice changingMultiple MyelomaRetrospective Cohort StudyAnti-CD38 Monoclonal AntibodyAutologous Stem Cell TransplantationBispecific T-Cell EngagerCAR T-Cell TherapyQuadruplet Induction TherapyAdultCarvyktiBortezomibCarfilzomibCiltacabtagene AutoleucelDaratumumabDexamethasoneLenalidomideTeclistamab

Summary

View source

What was studied

Among 310 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with quadruplet therapy (QUAD) + autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), this study tested four FHR cutoff points (12, 18, 24, and 36 months from treatment start) to find the best definition of functional high-risk (FHR) MM, and assessed the impact of T-cell–redirecting therapy (TCRT) on second-line outcomes (median follow-up 41.8 months, 66 progression events).

Key findings

The 36-month cutoff (FHR36) best matched the historical FHR benchmark of ~2-year post-progression OS: median OS was 23.8 months for FHR36 vs. 8.1 months for FHR18. FHR36 captured 16.4% of patients. Among those who progressed, 12-month second PFS (2PFS) was 80% with TCRT vs. 23% without TCRT; overall response rate was 91% vs. 47% (p = .009). On multivariable analysis, TCRT independently improved 2PFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04–0.71; p = .02).

Study limitations

- Only 11 patients (17% of progressors) received TCRT, limiting statistical power and external validity. - Combined prospective trial (MASTER) and institutional database patients introduce heterogeneity in induction/consolidation regimens. - TCRT use was driven by trial availability and fitness, introducing possible selection bias.

Clinical implications

In the QUAD + ASCT era, clinicians should redefine FHR MM as progression within **36 months** of starting therapy (not the older 18-month cutoff), which captures ~1 in 6 patients with poor conventional outcomes. Patients meeting FHR36 criteria should be prioritized for early TCRT (CAR T-cell or bispecific), given markedly better 2PFS and response rates.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the best second-line therapy for functional high-risk multiple myeloma after quadruplet therapy and ASCT?How does cilta-cel compare to standard care in early-relapse myeloma after daratumumab-based induction?Should the definition of functional high-risk myeloma be updated in the era of anti-CD38 quadruplet regimens?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Cancer
Sample Size
n=310
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next