ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Cancer statistics for Asian American, Na…

Cancer statistics for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander people, 2026

Cancer·August 27Open Access
OncologyPractice changingBreast CancerCancerColorectal CancerLiver CancerLung CancerProstate CancerStomach CancerUterine Corpus CancerPopulation-Based Registry StudyMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This American Cancer Society report used NCI SEER data (2000–2022) to present disaggregated cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and 5-year relative survival for 8 Asian American and 3 Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) ethnic groups in the US, covering approximately 66% of the AANHPI population across 21 registries.

Key findings

Overall incidence ranged from 218.3/100,000 (Kampuchean) to 474.5/100,000 (Native Hawaiian)—1.5× the aggregated AANHPI rate of 307.3/100,000. Samoan women had uterine corpus cancer rates ~3× those of White women (80.8 vs. 27.6/100,000). Five-year survival ranged from 42% (Laotian) to 74% (Asian Indian/Pakistani), with the widest gaps in colorectal (43% Laotian vs. 72% Asian Indian/Pakistani) and prostate cancer (63% Kampuchean vs. 97% Japanese).

Study limitations

- ~9% of Asian American and 26% of NHPI cases were classified as 'not otherwise specified,' likely causing underestimation of ethnic-group-specific rates. - Results reflect only 21 SEER registries covering 14 states; findings cannot be generalized to all AANHPI people in the US. - Hispanic ethnicity could not be distinguished within AANHPI groups, and recent screening/risk-factor data by ethnic subgroup are sparse.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should not treat Asian American and NHPI patients as a uniform group—cancer risk, screening rates, and survival differ dramatically across ethnic subgroups, with Native Hawaiian and Samoan patients facing disproportionate burdens. Culturally and linguistically tailored screening outreach (e.g., HBV screening for Vietnamese/Korean patients, uterine cancer awareness for Samoan/Native Hawaiian women) is more effective than one-size-fits-all approaches.

Caveats

  • No specific total sample size (N) was reported in the paper; the study covers all AANHPI cancer cases in 21 SEER registries from 2000–2022 across 14 states, so a single sample_size tag was omitted.
  • One author (Kekoa Taparra) reports consulting fees from Genentech; other authors are employed by the American Cancer Society, which receives health-sector funding.
  • Survival data (2015–2021) and incidence data (2018–2022) cover different time windows, which may limit direct comparisons between the two sets of findings.
Show all 4
  • The study design is an observational registry analysis; 'Population-Based Registry Study' was used as there is no exact standard label among RCT/cohort/case-control classifications.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the cancer screening recommendations for Vietnamese and Korean Americans given their high liver and stomach cancer rates?How does uterine corpus cancer incidence and survival compare between Native Hawaiian, Samoan, and White women?What community-based interventions have improved cancer screening uptake in Asian American and Pacific Islander populations?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Cancer
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next