ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Evaluation of ex‐utero collection for um…

Evaluation of ex‐utero collection for umbilical cord blood banking: A randomized clinical trial comparing cord blood quality with the in‐utero technique

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics·June 4
Obstetrics & GynecologyPractice changingUmbilical Cord Blood BankingRandomized Controlled TrialCord Blood CollectionAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This RCT compared ex-utero (after placental delivery) vs. in-utero (before placental delivery) umbilical cord blood (UCB) collection in 101 analyzed births (53 in-utero, 48 ex-utero) at a single Spanish center from September 2023 to September 2024, with a 1-min delayed cord clamping protocol in both arms.

Key findings

Ex-utero collection was non-inferior to in-utero collection: mean UCB weight was 107.19 g vs. 110.81 g (mean difference −3.62 g; 95% CI −13.41 to 6.16 g). TNC count, RBC count, hematocrit, platelets, and bacterial contamination rates (1 positive culture each) did not differ significantly between groups.

Study limitations

High exclusion rate (28/129 randomized were excluded—18 in the ex-utero arm vs. 10 in the in-utero arm), potentially introducing selection bias. Single-center, unblinded design limits generalizability. Bacteriology was assessed only in units designated for clinical use, not all collected units.

Clinical implications

Ex-utero UCB collection after placental delivery is a viable alternative to the standard in-utero method, offering a less intrusive birth experience without sacrificing unit quality or safety. Banks and maternity units can consider standardized ex-utero protocols to encourage more cord blood donations.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the impact of delayed cord clamping on cord blood banking volume?How does ex-utero cord blood collection affect stem cell yield and quality for transplantation?What are the best practices for reducing bacterial contamination in public cord blood banks?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Sample Size
n=101
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next