ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Identifying Psychological Profiles of Officially Reported Maltreated Children in South Korea Using Latent Profile Analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Identifying Psychological Profiles of Of…

Identifying Psychological Profiles of Officially Reported Maltreated Children in South Korea Using Latent Profile Analysis

Journal of Family Violence·August 22
Psychology, ClinicalConfirms priorChild MaltreatmentPsychological TraumaSelf-HarmCross-Sectional StudyAdolescentChild

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct psychological profiles among 7,879 officially reported maltreated children (ages 9–17) in South Korea (2023–2024), then examined how sex, school level, re-abuse history, and maltreatment type predicted profile membership via multinomial logistic regression.

Key findings

Four profiles emerged: **Severe Symptoms**, **Elevated Symptoms**, **Stable**, and **Elevated Symptoms with Mild Self-Harm**. Female sex and higher school level predicted membership in the Severe Symptoms group. Physical abuse, sexual abuse, and re-abuse history were more common in the Severe Symptoms group compared with the Stable and Elevated Symptoms with Mild Self-Harm groups.

Study limitations

- Data are confidential and cross-sectional, preventing causal inference or replication by outside researchers. - The sample is limited to *officially reported* maltreatment cases in South Korea, likely underrepresenting milder or unreported cases and limiting generalizability. - Profile-level psychological instruments were developed and standardized specifically for this South Korean maltreated-child context, so cross-cultural applicability is uncertain.

Clinical implications

Maltreated children are not a uniform group—screening should aim to detect which of several distinct symptom clusters a child falls into, particularly flagging girls and older students for more severe symptom profiles. Tailored, trauma-informed interventions—rather than one-size-fits-all approaches—appear warranted given the clear heterogeneity in risk.

Caveats

  • Full text was not available; summary is based on the abstract and reference list only — specific effect sizes, profile proportions, and instrument details could not be confirmed.
  • The mental health scale used (MHSMC) was developed and normed specifically for South Korean maltreated children; psychometric properties in other populations are unknown.
  • The study design tag reflects a cross-sectional survey of registry data; latent profile analysis is an analytic method, not a study design — some may classify this differently.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What psychological subtypes or profiles are seen in maltreated children and adolescents?How does sex and age affect mental health outcomes after child abuse?What trauma-informed interventions work best for different symptom profiles in child maltreatment?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Sample Size
n=7,879
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next