ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Mitigating ED boarding during surge cond…

Mitigating ED boarding during surge conditions: A multidisciplinary resilience model at a tertiary center epicenter

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine·August 18
Emergency MedicinePractice changingCOVID-19ED BoardingEmergency Department OvercrowdingRetrospective Quality Improvement StudyBusiness Intelligence DashboardOutpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial TherapyTelemedicineMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A retrospective quality improvement study evaluated a multidisciplinary rapid response team (RRT) intervention on ED boarding at a 1,058-bed tertiary hospital in New Taipei City during Taiwan's 2021 COVID-19 surge (43,368 ED visits). The RRT used three strategies: telemedicine diversion of mild cases to quarantine centers, real-time BI dashboard bed monitoring, and an ED-based outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program.

Key findings

Median ED boarding time dropped from 58.4 h (IQR 42.2–76.8) before the RRT to 6.2 h (IQR 4.1–11.5) after implementation (P < .001). The share of patients boarding >48 h fell from 5.09% in June to 0.16% by December 2021.

Study limitations

Retrospective, single-center design at a newly established hospital limits generalizability. No control group; secular trends (e.g., natural pandemic waning) cannot be fully excluded. The Taiwan context—quarantine infrastructure, telemedicine capacity—may not translate directly to other health systems.

Clinical implications

During surge conditions, combining telemedicine-based community diversion, real-time digital bed monitoring, and ED-based OPAT can dramatically cut boarding times. Hospitals preparing for future epidemic surges should consider building these three operational levers before the next crisis hits.

Caveats

  • No patient-level clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, adverse events) were reported; boarding time is an operational, not clinical, endpoint.
  • The 'practice_changing' impact flag reflects the magnitude of the reported effect, but the single-center retrospective design without a control group means causality is not established — concurrent factors (pandemic trajectory, policy changes) may have contributed.
  • The study was conducted at a newly established tertiary hospital, which may have unique staffing and infrastructure characteristics not representative of most EDs.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What interventions most effectively reduce ED boarding during infectious disease surges?How does an ED-based OPAT program work and when should I consider it for my patients?What role can real-time dashboards play in hospital bed management during a pandemic?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Sample Size
n=43,368
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next