ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Central Retinal Vessel Trunk Dragging in…

Central Retinal Vessel Trunk Dragging in Highly Myopic Eyes

American Journal of Ophthalmology·August 3
OphthalmologyConfirms priorHigh MyopiaMyopic Macular DegenerationParapapillary RetinoschisisRetrospective Cohort StudyOptical Coherence TomographyOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

Prevalence and associations of central retinal vessel trunk (CRVT) dragging were assessed using OCT images of the optic disc and macula in 3,336 participants of the Beijing Eye Study (mean age 64.2 years; axial length range 20.16–30.88 mm).

Key findings

CRVT dragging prevalence rose sharply with axial length: 0% in eyes ≤25.0 mm, 5.2% (25.01–26.0 mm), 12.2% (26.01–27.0 mm), 24.0% (27.01–28.0 mm), and 72.2% in eyes >28.0 mm. On multivariable analysis, longer optic disc–fovea distance (OR 5.82), parapapillary retinoschisis (OR 8.61), longer axial length (OR 1.95), and older age (OR 1.08) were independently associated with CRVT dragging.

Study limitations

Retrospective design limits causal inference. Single-eye analysis per participant may not capture bilateral variation. The study population is older Chinese adults (Beijing Eye Study), limiting generalizability to younger or other ethnic cohorts.

Clinical implications

In highly myopic eyes (axial length >28 mm), CRVT dragging is present in nearly three-quarters of cases and distorts optic nerve head morphology — clinicians should account for this when diagnosing optic neuropathies such as glaucoma in high myopes. Increased fovea–disc distance is a key driver and may serve as a practical marker for suspecting this finding.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does high myopia affect optic nerve head morphology and glaucoma diagnosis?What is the clinical significance of parapapillary retinoschisis in myopic eyes?How should glaucoma be diagnosed differently in highly myopic patients with long axial length?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Sample Size
n=3,336
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next