ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Emergency Department Visits for Gambling…

Emergency Department Visits for Gambling Disorders After the Legalization of Single-Event Sports Betting and Rapid Expansion of Online Gambling

American Journal of Preventive Medicine·September 16Open Access
Medicine, General & InternalPractice changingGambling DisorderInterrupted Time SeriesMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This population-based interrupted time series study examined changes in emergency department (ED) visit rates for gambling disorders among all Ontario residents aged ≥10 years (N=17,353,640) before and after the legalization of single-event sports betting and privatized online gambling in April 2022, tracked from January 2012 to June 2025.

Key findings

Over 14 years, 952 ED visits for gambling disorders occurred (757 unique individuals; mean age 41.8 years; 72% male); after liberalization, overall quarterly rates rose 31.3% (1.28 to 1.68 per 1,000,000), increasing by 7% per quarter (IRR=1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.10), and reaching ~99% higher than expected by April–June 2025 (IRR=1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.67)—driven entirely by young males (ages 10–29: IRR=2.54; ages 30–44: IRR=2.16), with no increase in females.

Study limitations

ED visits represent only the most severe gambling disorder cases, likely undercounting the true burden of gambling harms in the general population; the study cannot establish causation between gambling liberalization and increased visits, as other concurrent societal factors may have contributed; and the results from Ontario, Canada may not generalize to other jurisdictions with different gambling regulatory environments.

Clinical implications

Clinicians—especially those in emergency settings—should be alert to gambling disorder presentations in young men, as ED visit rates roughly doubled following online gambling expansion; routine screening for gambling harms in this demographic is warranted, particularly in regions where online and sports betting have recently been legalized.

Caveats

  • ED visits capture only the most severe end of gambling disorder, so the true population-level burden of gambling harm is likely much larger than these figures suggest
  • The 14-year observation period includes fewer than 1,000 ED visits, making subgroup estimates (e.g., females, youngest age bands) statistically imprecise with wide confidence intervals
  • The study population is limited to Ontario, Canada, where a specific regulatory transition occurred; findings may not apply to jurisdictions with different gambling market structures or timelines

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does online gambling legalization affect gambling disorder prevalence in young men?What screening tools are recommended for gambling disorder in emergency department settings?What public health interventions reduce gambling-related harms after sports betting legalization?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Sample Size
n=17,353,640
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next