ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Social Media and Crisis Care Principles…

Social Media and Crisis Care Principles During Pandemics and Disasters: A Consensus Report From a Subgroup of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care

CHEST·September 15
Respiratory SystemPractice changingCOVID-19Disaster MedicineMass Critical CareConsensus Statement / Modified DelphiMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A subgroup of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care (TFMCC) used a three-round modified Delphi process to evaluate communication and coordination strategies during pandemics and disasters, drawing on 147 evidence statements from peer-reviewed literature, gray sources, and expert experience.

Key findings

The process yielded 22 consensus-based suggestions; key findings emphasize transparent, timely, science-based public communication via social media, standardized crisis care frameworks, Medical Operations Coordination Centers, interoperable health information systems, equitable resource allocation, and integration of emergency department expertise into hospital incident command.

Study limitations

Consensus-based methodology relies heavily on expert opinion and anecdotal experience rather than controlled trial evidence; generalizability may be limited by the composition and perspectives of the task force subgroup.

Clinical implications

During disasters, health systems should invest in proactive social media engagement, interoperable real-time data systems, and coordinated supply-chain logistics to the 'last mile.' Avoid restrictive visitation policies that block surrogate decision-making, and embed ED expertise within hospital incident command structures.

Caveats

  • Study design is a consensus/Delphi process; level of evidence is rated 7 (expert opinion) due to absence of primary clinical trial data.
  • The paper is dated September 2026, which is beyond current real-world publication norms; content is treated as provided without independent verification.
  • The sample_size tag reflects the number of evidence statements evaluated (n=147), not a patient cohort — no human participant N is reported.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are best practices for social media communication during public health emergencies?How do Medical Operations Coordination Centers improve disaster response outcomes?What crisis standards of care frameworks are recommended for mass critical care events?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
CHEST
Sample Size
n=147
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next