ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Processes in psychotherapy: A scoping re…

Processes in psychotherapy: A scoping review with LLM-assisted clustering

Clinical Psychology Review·June 29Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalConfirms priorMental Health DisordersScoping ReviewCognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotherapyMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A scoping review of studies examining processes of therapeutic change in psychological interventions, covering 778 studies published since 2007, with AI-assisted clustering (GPT-5 nano) used to organize 684 identified processes into thematic clusters.

Key findings

32 process clusters were identified; the largest cluster — common factors (therapeutic alliance, collaborative processes, interpersonal functioning) — accounted for 20.6% of all investigated processes. The remaining processes were mainly specific CBT-related factors (e.g., cognitive appraisal, belief change). Research focus and volume have not meaningfully changed over the study period.

Study limitations

Scoping reviews do not appraise study quality, so the evidence base behind each process cluster is unvetted. The AI-assisted clustering relied on a single LLM (GPT-5 nano), which may introduce classification bias. Coverage begins in 2007, potentially missing earlier foundational work.

Clinical implications

Therapeutic alliance and common factors remain the dominant focus of process research — clinicians can feel confident these constructs are well-studied. However, the field's stagnation suggests that emerging or underexplored mechanisms of change likely lack robust evidence to guide practice refinement.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which therapeutic processes most strongly predict outcomes in CBT for anxiety and depression?How does therapeutic alliance compare to specific CBT techniques in driving symptom improvement?What are the least studied mechanisms of change in psychotherapy and why does it matter?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Clinical Psychology Review
Sample Size
n=778
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next