ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Early visual and spontaneous motor behaviour in very preterm infants: Associations with fidgety movement quality
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Early visual and spontaneous motor behav…

Early visual and spontaneous motor behaviour in very preterm infants: Associations with fidgety movement quality

Early Human Development·September 19Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyConfirms priorNeurodevelopmental DelayPrematurityCross-Sectional StudyNeurodevelopmental AssessmentInfant

Summary

View source

What was studied

Cross-sectional study examining associations between early visual behaviour (Neonatal Visual Assessment) and spontaneous motor behaviour (General Movements Assessment, Motor Optimality Score-Revised) in 84 very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age) without major brain injury, assessed at 12–16 weeks corrected age.

Key findings

Global visual function was strongly associated with motor optimality (rs = −0.67, p < .001); visual tracking showed the strongest domain-specific associations with movement repertoire (q = 0.004) and movement patterns (q = 0.021); infants with absent fidgety movements had the poorest overall visual behaviour compared with both normal and abnormal fidgety movement groups.

Study limitations

Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference; the sample excludes infants with major brain injury, limiting generalisability to more severely affected preterm infants; long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were not assessed.

Clinical implications

When assessing very preterm infants at around 3 months corrected age, poor visual tracking and absent fidgety movements together may signal concurrent immaturity across both visual and motor systems, warranting closer developmental follow-up.

Caveats

  • All infants had no major brain injury, so findings may not apply to the higher-risk end of the preterm population
  • Corrected age assessment window (12–16 weeks) is narrow; it is unknown whether these associations persist or change at later developmental time points
  • Spearman correlations with false discovery rate correction were used, but the cross-sectional design cannot establish the direction of any causal relationship between visual and motor development

Related Questions

Explore related topics

General Movements Assessment fidgety movements as predictor of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infantsNeonatal visual assessment tools reliability and validity in preterm populationsMotor Optimality Score-Revised associations with long-term development in very preterm infants

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Early Human Development
Sample Size
n=84
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next