ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Su…

Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis of 1032 Patients

European Urology Oncology·June 20Open Access
Urology & NephrologyConfirms priorNon-Muscle-Invasive Bladder CancerUrothelial CarcinomaRetrospective Multicenter Cohort StudyRadical CystectomyAdultOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in 1032 patients with pathological NMIBC (pTis/pTa/pT1 N0 R0) who underwent radical cystectomy at nine centers (2000–2015), with no perioperative therapy and a median follow-up of 45.2 months.

Key findings

LVI (present in 3.8% of patients) was the strongest independent predictor of both recurrence (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.29–4.38) and cancer-specific mortality (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.31–5.10). LVI-positive patients had 10-year CSM of 35.3% vs. 13.7% in LVI-negative patients (p=0.002). Pathological stage (Tis/Ta/T1) was not an independent predictor of RFS (p=0.074). Age alone predicted OS (HR 1.06/year). Model discrimination was modest (optimism-corrected C-index 0.569).

Study limitations

- Retrospective design with potential unmeasured confounding, including lack of data on prior BCG exposure and number of prior recurrences. - LVI was assessed locally at each institution, introducing interobserver variability risk. - Small number of LVI-positive patients (n=39) limits subgroup statistical power; wide confidence intervals warrant external validation.

Clinical implications

After radical cystectomy for NMIBC, check LVI status — LVI-positive pT1 patients have 5-year recurrence rates (~28.5%) approaching those of MIBC and should receive intensified surveillance in the first 24 months. Pathological stage alone should not guide post-cystectomy risk stratification; no treatment recommendations can yet be made based on LVI status.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in bladder cancer after radical cystectomy?Should pathological stage guide surveillance after cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer?Which patients with pT1 bladder cancer are at highest risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
European Urology Oncology
Sample Size
n=1,032
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next