ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Heterogeneous Reduction in Paediatric RSV Hospitalisations Following Regional Nirsevimab Immunisation Strategies: A Multicentre Study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Heterogeneous Reduction in Paediatric RS…

Heterogeneous Reduction in Paediatric RSV Hospitalisations Following Regional Nirsevimab Immunisation Strategies: A Multicentre Study

International Journal of Infectious Diseases·August 27Open Access
Infectious DiseasesPractice changingRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionRetrospective Multicentre Cohort StudyMonoclonal AntibodyPediatricBeyfortusNirsevimab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective multicentre study across 19 Italian paediatric units examined RSV-related hospitalisations in children under 18 years over six seasons (January 2019–March 2025), comparing rates before and after regional nirsevimab immunisation rollouts grouped by eligibility criteria (Groups A–G).

Key findings

10,915 RSV hospitalisations were recorded; in the 2024–2025 season, overall hospitalisations fell 43.6%. Groups with broader eligibility and earlier rollout saw the greatest reductions (Group B ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.22–0.36; Group A ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.74), while narrower or delayed programmes showed modest reductions (ratios 0.58–0.70). One group (G) showed no clear reduction after accounting for baseline instability (ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.15–2.94).

Study limitations

Observational design prevents causal inference or direct comparison of regional strategies. Group G results were confounded by baseline instability. Group F findings are from a single centre and are only indicative.

Clinical implications

Broader nirsevimab eligibility criteria and timely seasonal rollout appear to drive the largest reductions in paediatric RSV hospitalisations. Programmes with narrow eligibility or delayed start showed substantially smaller benefits.

Caveats

  • Group F data come from a single centre — findings for that group should be interpreted cautiously.
  • Group G's apparently elevated ratio (1.84) is attributed to baseline instability rather than a true increase in risk, which may be misread without context.
  • Sample size (n=10,915) reflects total RSV hospitalisations across six seasons, not individual patients enrolled in a prospective study.
Show all 4
  • The level of evidence is rated 3 (retrospective cohort); the study explicitly cannot establish causation or compare effectiveness between regional strategies.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does nirsevimab eligibility breadth affect RSV hospitalisation rates in infants and young children?What is the real-world effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing paediatric RSV hospitalisations?How do regional immunisation rollout timing and criteria influence RSV outcomes in children?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Sample Size
n=10,915
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next