ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026)
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial…

Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026)

JACC·August 28Open Access
Cardiac & Cardiovascular SystemsPractice changingAcute Coronary SyndromeMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial InjuryExpert Consensus DocumentCardiac Magnetic Resonance ImagingCoronary Artery Bypass GraftingCoronary Computed Tomography AngiographyHigh-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin AssayInvasive Coronary AngiographyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF consensus document proposes a revised clinical classification of myocardial infarction (MI), replacing the prior numerical type 1–5 system with three categories—primary, secondary, and procedure-related MI—supported by objective diagnostic criteria, updated ICD-11 coding, and guidance on cardiac biomarkers, imaging, and special populations.

Key findings

The Fifth UDMI replaces the previous numerical MI types with three clinical categories: (1) primary MI (spontaneous acute coronary pathology, including atherothrombosis, SCAD, vasospasm, embolism); (2) secondary MI (oxygen supply–demand imbalance from another acute condition, confirmed by obstructive CAD or new wall motion abnormality/loss of viability); and (3) procedure-related MI (cardiac procedure complication within 30 days, confirmed by coronary complication plus new wall motion abnormality or loss of viability—both required if the complication occurs during the index procedure). Sex-specific 99th percentile troponin thresholds define myocardial injury, and diagnosis of procedure-related MI no longer relies on arbitrary biomarker multiples.

Study limitations

This is a consensus/expert statement, not a systematic review or clinical trial, so recommendations reflect task force opinion and available observational evidence rather than randomized data. Many key diagnostic criteria (e.g., troponin thresholds of >5× URL post-PCI and >35× URL post-surgery to trigger imaging) remain arbitrary and unvalidated. Applicability is constrained in low-resource settings where high-sensitivity troponin, coronary angiography, and cardiac imaging are unavailable.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should apply the new three-category MI classification (primary, secondary, procedure-related) and use sex-specific 99th percentile troponin thresholds to define myocardial injury, avoiding the old type 1–5 labels. Imaging—coronary angiography and/or CMR—is required to confirm secondary and procedure-related MI rather than relying on troponin levels alone.

Caveats

  • Guidance for low-resource settings is limited by evidence gaps; many recommendations assume access to high-sensitivity troponin, coronary angiography, and advanced cardiac imaging not universally available
  • ICD-11 codes proposed in the document were still under WHO review at the time of publication; implementation will vary by country and health system
  • This is a consensus statement, not a clinical trial; diagnostic thresholds (e.g., >5× URL post-PCI, >35× URL post-surgery) are acknowledged by the authors as arbitrary and require prospective validation

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How do I apply the new primary vs secondary vs procedure-related MI classification in practice?What are sex-specific cardiac troponin thresholds and why do they matter for diagnosing MI in women?When is cardiac imaging required to confirm or exclude secondary myocardial infarction?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JACC
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next