ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
A Socioecological Approach to Adolescent Suicide Risk: The Roles of Social Bonds and Recognition
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. A Socioecological Approach to Adolescent…

A Socioecological Approach to Adolescent Suicide Risk: The Roles of Social Bonds and Recognition

Journal of Adolescent Health·August 4
PediatricsPractice changingAdolescent Mental HealthSuicidal IdeationSuicide AttemptCross-Sectional StudyPsychosocial InterventionAdolescent

Summary

View source

What was studied

Using the 2023 Pennsylvania Youth Survey (n=190,151 students), this cross-sectional study examined whether stronger social bonds and recognition across family, school, and community domains were associated with lower adolescent suicide risk (ideation, plan, attempt, injury), both directly and indirectly through individual/interpersonal risk factors (substance use, depression, bullying victimization), with rurality included as a covariate.

Key findings

Suicidal ideation was reported by 16%, plan by 13%, attempt by 5%, and injury by attempt by 1%. Family attachment had the largest direct protective association with suicide risk; school commitment had the largest indirect protective association via reduced individual/interpersonal risk factors. Community recognition showed the largest direct protective association among social recognition domains; family recognition had the largest indirect effect through social bonds and lower risk factors. Rurality, substance use, depression, and bullying victimization were each associated with higher suicide risk.

Study limitations

Cross-sectional design limits causal inference. The sample is geographically restricted to Pennsylvania, which may limit generalizability. All measures were self-reported and dichotomous for suicide outcomes, which may reduce precision.

Clinical implications

Clinicians and school health teams should assess family attachment, school connectedness, and community recognition as protective factors—not just individual risk—when screening adolescents for suicide risk. Coordinated, multisector prevention efforts (family, school, community) are especially important for rural youth.

Caveats

  • Structural equation modeling pathways are described directionally (e.g., 'associated with lower risk'), but the observational design does not confirm mediation in a causal sense.
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing reflects the large sample size and multi-domain findings, but causal claims cannot be made due to the cross-sectional design.
  • The study is limited to Pennsylvania public school students; findings may not generalize to other states, private schools, or out-of-school youth.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the most effective school-based interventions to reduce adolescent suicide risk?How does family connectedness protect against teen suicidal ideation and attempts?What suicide prevention strategies are recommended for rural adolescents?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Adolescent Health
Sample Size
n=190,151
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next