ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Risk Stratification for Tuberculosis Reactivation in Patients Receiving Biological and Non-biological Immunomodulators: A Review of Current Literature
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Risk Stratification for Tuberculosis Rea…

Risk Stratification for Tuberculosis Reactivation in Patients Receiving Biological and Non-biological Immunomodulators: A Review of Current Literature

Journal of Infection·September 6Open Access
Infectious DiseasesPractice changingLatent Tuberculosis InfectionTuberculosisNarrative ReviewBCL-2 InhibitorBiologic ImmunomodulatorCalcineurin InhibitorGlucocorticoidImmune Checkpoint InhibitorIntegrin AntagonistInterleukin AntagonistJAK InhibitorProteasome InhibitorMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation mechanisms and risk levels associated with nine major classes of immunosuppressive agents (biological and non-biological), and collates FDA and EMA prescribing guidance on TB screening across these drug classes.

Key findings

Multiple immunosuppressant classes — including B- and T-cell depleting agents, interleukin antagonists, cytokine antagonists, integrin antagonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, kinase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, and BCL-2 inhibitors — carry meaningful risk of LTBI reactivation, underscoring the need for systematic TB screening and preventive therapy before initiation.

Study limitations

As a narrative review, it does not perform a meta-analysis or quantify comparative reactivation rates across drug classes; risk estimates depend on the quality and heterogeneity of the underlying primary literature. No original patient-level data are presented.

Clinical implications

Before starting any major immunosuppressive agent, screen patients for LTBI using both tuberculin skin test and IGRA, and initiate preventive treatment per FDA/EMA guidance — especially for TNF antagonists, JAK inhibitors, and T/B-cell depleting therapies, which carry the highest reactivation concern. Maintain vigilance for TB reactivation throughout the treatment course, even in patients who screened negative at baseline.

Caveats

  • No sample size is applicable — this is a review article with no primary patient cohort. Impact flag 'practice_changing' applied because the review consolidates FDA/EMA regulatory guidance across nine drug classes into a single actionable framework, which is clinically significant; however, it is based on synthesized rather than new trial evidence. Sex of study population is not reported, as expected for a literature review.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which immunosuppressants carry the highest risk of latent TB reactivation and require preventive therapy before starting?What are the current FDA and EMA recommendations for TB screening before initiating biologics or JAK inhibitors?How should LTBI be managed in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors or BCL-2 inhibitors?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Infection
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next