ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Analyses of gender disparities in receip…

Analyses of gender disparities in receipt of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests by patient’s age group and bystander category

Resuscitation·July 5
Emergency MedicinePractice changingOut-Of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestRegistry-Based Cohort StudyCardiopulmonary ResuscitationMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study examined gender disparities in receipt of bystander CPR after witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) of presumed cardiac etiology in Japan (2005–2023), stratifying by patient age group (≤14, 15–49, 50–64, 65–74, ≥75 years) and bystander category (e.g., family, friends/colleagues, passersby, staff/related personnel).

Key findings

Among 453,441 patients, females overall were *more* likely to receive bystander CPR than males (adjusted OR 1.100, 95% CI 1.084–1.113), but females aged 15–64 were *less* likely to receive CPR when bystanders were friends, colleagues, or passersby. Bystander category had a far stronger association with CPR receipt (OR 3.555 for staff/related personnel vs. family, 95% CI 3.500–3.611) than patient gender.

Study limitations

- Registry data may lack granularity on reasons CPR was withheld (e.g., do-not-resuscitate orders, bystander training status). - The study is observational; causality cannot be established. - "Gender" is based on registry classification, which may not capture full diversity.

Clinical implications

CPR training and public health campaigns should focus on overcoming hesitancy to perform CPR on women in non-family settings (e.g., workplaces, public spaces), particularly for women aged 15–64. Bystander category — not patient gender — is the dominant driver of CPR receipt disparities.

Caveats

  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing is applied cautiously — the finding strongly reframes the gender disparity narrative toward bystander context, which has direct CPR training implications.
  • The paper uses the term 'gender' but the registry likely records biological sex; these may not be interchangeable in all cases.
  • The study is from Japan (2005–2023); cultural and social norms around touching strangers may limit generalizability to other countries.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What factors explain gender differences in bystander CPR rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?How does bystander relationship to the victim affect likelihood of performing CPR?Do CPR training programs reduce gender-based disparities in resuscitation outcomes?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Resuscitation
Sample Size
n=453,441
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next