ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Effect of a community-based behavioural…

Effect of a community-based behavioural intervention bundle to improve antibiotic use and patient management in Burkina Faso and DR Congo (CABU-EICO): a cluster-randomised controlled trial

The Lancet Infectious Diseases·June 15
Infectious DiseasesPractice changingAntimicrobial ResistanceCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCluster-Randomised Controlled TrialAntibiotic StewardshipBehavioural InterventionMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A cluster-randomised controlled trial in Burkina Faso and DR Congo evaluated whether a co-created community-based intervention bundle (health education campaigns + provider education/feedback on WHO AWaRe guidance, over 9 months) reduced Watch-group antibiotic use and improved patient management across all community-level health-care providers.

Key findings

Watch-group antibiotic use fell from 26.8% to 17.1% in the intervention group but rose from 13.4% to 21.2% in controls (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.78); patient management scores showed minimal change in either group.

Study limitations

Baseline Watch-group antibiotic prevalence differed notably between arms (26.8% vs 13.4%), raising concerns about comparability. Providers with fewer than 20 completed surveys were excluded, potentially limiting generalisability. Simulated patient visits may not fully reflect real-world prescribing behaviour.

Clinical implications

A multi-round community and provider education programme using WHO AWaRe guidance can cut Watch-group (broad-spectrum) antibiotic use by roughly two-thirds without harming patient care. Health systems in sub-Saharan Africa should consider scaling co-created AWaRe-based stewardship to informal and private community providers, not just formal facilities.

Caveats

  • Sample size of n=10,430 reflects combined baseline and post-intervention patient surveys; the trial enrolled 44 clusters (villages/neighbourhoods), not individual participants as the primary unit. Numeric tag approximates total surveyed patients across both periods (5,532 + 4,898).
  • Substantial baseline imbalance in Watch-group antibiotic prevalence between intervention (26.8%) and control (13.4%) arms is noteworthy; authors used adjusted analysis but this difference may affect interpretation of effect size.
  • The study is registered and published but today's date (June 20, 2026) is only days after the listed publication date (June 15, 2026); full data may not yet be widely peer-reviewed or replicated.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the WHO AWaRe classification and how should it guide antibiotic prescribing in low-resource settings?Which community-level antibiotic stewardship interventions have been effective in sub-Saharan Africa?How do informal drug vendors contribute to antibiotic misuse and resistance in low- and middle-income countries?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Sample Size
n=10,430
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next