ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Programmatic effectiveness of tuberculosis preventive treatment for people with HIV in six high-tuberculosis-burden countries (PROTECT): a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Programmatic effectiveness of tuberculos…

Programmatic effectiveness of tuberculosis preventive treatment for people with HIV in six high-tuberculosis-burden countries (PROTECT): a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis

The Lancet HIV·August 17Open Access
ImmunologyInfectious DiseasesConfirms priorHIV/AIDSLatent Tuberculosis InfectionTuberculosisProspective Cohort Study With Target Trial Emulation And Meta-AnalysisAntiretroviral TherapyTuberculosis Preventive TreatmentMixedDolutegravirIsoniazid

Summary

View source

What was studied

This prospective cohort study used target trial emulation across 235,424 people with HIV initiating ART in six high-TB-burden countries (Haiti, Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda, Ukraine, Zimbabwe) between 2018–2022, comparing TB incidence and all-cause mortality over 2 years in those who started TPT (isoniazid, 6-month) within 8 weeks of HIV care enrollment vs. those who never received TPT.

Key findings

TPT initiation within 8 weeks was associated with a 61% reduction in TB incidence (pooled HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.34–0.43; I²=0%) and a 45% reduction in all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.51–0.58; I²=96%) across all six countries. Country-specific TB HRs ranged from 0.35 (Haiti) to 0.60 (Kenya); mortality HRs ranged from 0.25 (Uganda) to 0.69 (Zimbabwe). Benefits were consistent across children <15 years, all WHO clinical stages, and dolutegravir-based regimens.

Study limitations

- Heavy reliance on EMR data with substantial missing CD4 counts (up to 100% in Haiti) and unverified TPT adherence/completion data, making results conservative for full-course effectiveness. - Unmeasured confounding by indication (e.g., healthier patients may have preferentially received TPT), provider preferences, drug supply gaps, and COVID-19 disruptions could not be fully adjusted for. - Nigeria was underpowered (n=8,053 vs. target ~18,000), limiting country-specific conclusions; contact with drug-resistant TB cases was unavailable as a covariate.

Clinical implications

Start TPT as early as possible after HIV care enrollment—benefit was greatest within 2 weeks but still significant within 8 weeks—for all people with HIV, including children, those with early-stage disease, and those on dolutegravir-based ART. These real-world data across 235,000 patients confirm TPT should remain a standard, non-negotiable part of HIV care in high-TB-burden settings.

Caveats

  • CD4 count data were missing for the majority of participants in Haiti, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria due to policy shifts away from routine CD4 testing, which may affect confounder adjustment.
  • Significant heterogeneity in mortality benefit across countries (I²=96%) limits interpretation of the pooled mortality HR; country-specific estimates vary nearly 3-fold.
  • The study design is a target trial emulation of observational EMR data, not a true RCT; residual confounding by indication cannot be excluded despite rigorous inverse propensity weighting.
Show all 4
  • TPT regimen evaluated was primarily 6-month isoniazid; results may not directly apply to newer short-course regimens (3HP, 1HP) now entering programmatic use.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the optimal timing and duration of TPT for people with HIV on dolutegravir-based ART?How does short-course TPT (3HP or 1HP) compare to 6-month isoniazid for TB prevention in people with HIV?What are the barriers to TB preventive treatment scale-up in high-burden countries and how can they be overcome?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet HIV
Sample Size
n=235,424
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next