ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Premenarche risk factors for future dysmenorrhoea: a prospective cohort study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Premenarche risk factors for future dysm…

Premenarche risk factors for future dysmenorrhoea: a prospective cohort study

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health·September 1
PediatricsPractice changingChronic Pelvic PainDysmenorrhoeaSleep DisturbanceProspective Cohort StudyAdolescent

Summary

View source

What was studied

This prospective cohort study examined premenarche risk factors (ages 9–10) for dysmenorrhoea presence and severity at ages 12–13 in 2,254 female adolescents from the US population-based ABCD Study, following up at 3 years after baseline.

Key findings

57.6% (n=1,299) developed dysmenorrhoea by age 12–13, with 19.0% of those reporting severe symptoms. Non-painful somatic symptoms predicted future dysmenorrhoea (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.32). Advanced pubertal status at ages 9–10 was the strongest predictor (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.47–2.17). Black and Hispanic adolescents had ~34–38% higher odds of dysmenorrhoea vs. White and non-Hispanic peers, respectively. Sleep disturbances predicted menstrual pain interference (β 0.16, 95% CI 0.01–0.31), but not dysmenorrhoea status itself.

Study limitations

- Dysmenorrhoea was assessed only at a single follow-up (age 12–13), limiting longitudinal tracking of severity changes. - Self- and parent-reported measures introduce potential recall and reporting bias. - Study was conducted in the USA only, limiting global generalizability.

Clinical implications

Screen girls aged 9–10 for early pubertal development, non-painful somatic symptoms, sleep problems, and social risk factors (lower income, Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity) as early markers of dysmenorrhoea risk. Proactive identification before menarche may allow earlier intervention before pain becomes chronic.

Caveats

  • Dysmenorrhoea diagnosis relied on survey self-report (Menstrual Cycle Survey), not clinical evaluation, which may affect classification accuracy.
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing reflects a novel prospective identification of premenarche risk factors; however, no clinical intervention was tested in this study — translation to practice requires further validation.
  • The study population is US-based and drawn from a cognitive development cohort (ABCD Study), which may not be fully representative of all demographic groups globally.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are effective early interventions for adolescents at high risk of dysmenorrhoea?How does early pubertal development relate to chronic pain outcomes in adolescent girls?Do racial and socioeconomic disparities in dysmenorrhoea persist into adulthood?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Sample Size
n=2,254
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next