Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

publisher

articletitle

journaltitle

articlelink

content_type

copyright

National Psoriasis Foundation

Psoriasis prevalence in adults in the United States

JAMA Dermatol

Shared decision making in dermatology: asking patients, “what is important to you?”

Br J Dermatol

Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences

Implement Sci

Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)

Soc Sci Med 1982

Treatment satisfaction and need for shared decision-making in patients with psoriasis from Peru

The current extent of and need for shared decision making in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in the Netherlands: an online survey study amongst patients and physicians

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol

Shared decision making, satisfaction with care and medication adherence among patients with diabetes

Patient Educ Couns

Clarifying the predictive value of family-centered care and shared decision making for pediatric healthcare outcomes using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Health Serv Res

Shared decision-making in pediatrics: a national perspective

Pediatrics

Patient satisfaction, self-rated health status, and health confidence: an assessment of the utility of single-item questions

Am J Med Qual

Barriers to shared decision-making with women of reproductive age affected by a chronic inflammatory disease: a mixed-methods needs assessment of dermatologists and rheumatologists

BMJ Open

Psoriasis education tool for patient-physician decision-making about biologics: a pilot study

Skin Ther Lett

Towards more shared decision making in dermatology: development of evidence-based decision cards for psoriasis and atopic eczema treatments

Acta Derm Venereol

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a critical component of the patient-physician relationship. Although SDM has been reported to improve patient knowledge in other fields, it is still relatively unknown in dermatology.
To determine the association between SDM and satisfaction with care among patients with psoriasis.
Cross-sectional study using data from the 2014 to 2017 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
A weighted total of 3,715,027 patients with psoriasis were identified. The average SDM score was 3.6 (of 4), and the average satisfaction with care score was 8.6 (of 10). Approximately 42% of the cohort reported having a high SDM (score, ≥3.9). Patients who had high SDM had, on average, 85% higher satisfaction with care (P < .001) after adjusting for covariates.
The results of our study should be interpreted within the context of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database. The ability to measure SDM was limited by the 7 items from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which may not fully capture active participation in shared decision-making.
A majority of patients with psoriasis are not participating in highly SDM. It is important to construct a framework for carrying out SDM efficiently to enhance physician-patient communication and improve patient outcomes.

Shared decision-making and satisfaction with care in patients with psoriasis: A population-based study in the United States.

Shared decision-making and satisfaction with care in patients with psoriasis: A population-based study in the United States

Papers