ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Liquid Biopsies for Cancer
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Liquid Biopsies for Cancer

Liquid Biopsies for Cancer

JAMA·August 10
Medicine, General & InternalPractice changingBreast CancerColorectal CancerNon-Small Cell Lung CancerUrothelial CarcinomaReview / Meta-Analysis (Incorporating Prospective Cohort Data)Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA) SequencingLiquid BiopsyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This review evaluates the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) liquid biopsies for monitoring cancer progression, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), identifying resistance mutations, and guiding treatment decisions across multiple cancer types including NSCLC, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and urothelial carcinoma.

Key findings

In a meta-analysis of 1,725 urothelial carcinoma patients, higher ctDNA levels correlated with markedly worse disease-free survival (HR 20.69; 95% CI 9.63–44.43) and overall survival in metastatic settings (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.25–3.38). In a prospective cohort of 130 colorectal cancer patients, ctDNA detected molecular relapse ~8.7 months earlier than standard imaging (5.5 vs. 14.2 months; P < .001).

Study limitations

Optimal timing of ctDNA testing is not yet defined; management of ctDNA-positive results without radiographic disease remains uncertain; cost-effectiveness of serial ctDNA monitoring has not been established.

Clinical implications

ctDNA can flag recurrence months before imaging and help select molecularly targeted therapy — but clinicians should not yet act on positive ctDNA alone without clear protocols, as best practices for result management and monitoring intervals are still being defined.

Caveats

  • Absolute survival rates for ctDNA outcomes in urothelial carcinoma and metastatic settings were not reported in the source text.
  • The impact_flag 'practice_changing' is applied cautiously — ctDNA is increasingly used clinically, but the paper itself acknowledges that optimal protocols are still undefined.
  • The study design tag reflects a hybrid: the paper is a JAMA review article that incorporates a meta-analysis (n=1,725) and a prospective cohort (n=130) — these represent distinct sub-studies, not a single unified trial. The sample size tag reflects the largest cited meta-analysis cohort.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does ctDNA compare to standard imaging for detecting colorectal cancer recurrence?Which cancer types have the strongest evidence for ctDNA-guided treatment decisions?What are the current guidelines for managing ctDNA-positive results with no radiographic disease?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA
Sample Size
n=1,725
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next