ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Tuberculosis-Related Outcomes in Dermatologic Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Tuberculosis-Related Outcomes in Dermato…

Tuberculosis-Related Outcomes in Dermatologic Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy

JAMA Dermatology·July 15Open Access
DermatologyPractice changingLatent Tuberculosis InfectionPsoriasisSystemic Lupus ErythematosusSystemic SclerosisTuberculosisSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisConventional ImmunosuppressantGlucocorticoidIL-12/23 InhibitorIL-17 InhibitorTNF InhibitorAdultStelaraAdalimumabBelimumabEtanerceptInfliximabIxekizumabRituximabSecukinumabUstekinumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of active TB and LTBI conversion in dermatologic patients receiving systemic therapy (biologics, glucocorticoids, conventional immunosuppressants), spanning 31 studies with 15,005 patients searched through October 2025, with subgroup analyses by biologic class (TNF inhibitors, IL-17, IL-12/23) and regional TB burden.

Key findings

Pooled LTBI conversion rate was 4.3% overall, highest with TNF inhibitors, followed by IL-17 inhibitors and ustekinumab (IL-12/23 p40 inhibitor). Active TB incidence was 1.0% overall, with markedly higher rates in high-burden regions (e.g., 30.2% in India with high-dose glucocorticoids, 14.1% in South Africa with SLE) versus very low rates in low-burden regions (e.g., 0.095% in the UK). Biologic-only LTBI conversion analyses showed substantial heterogeneity (I² = 81%).

Study limitations

High heterogeneity across studies (I² = 81% for biologic LTBI conversion) limits precision of pooled estimates. LTBI testing methods varied (TST vs. IGRA) and baseline screening protocols differed. Most included studies were observational cohorts with variable prophylaxis use, follow-up duration, and risk-of-bias scores (NOS 4–8/9).

Clinical implications

Screen all dermatologic patients for LTBI before starting biologics—especially TNF inhibitors—and factor in regional TB burden when deciding on prophylaxis and monitoring intensity. In high-burden regions, even conventional immunosuppressants (glucocorticoids) carry substantial active TB risk and warrant close vigilance.

Caveats

  • Active TB rates varied dramatically across individual studies (0.095% to 30.2%), largely driven by regional TB burden and immunosuppressive regimen intensity—pooled estimates should be interpreted in the context of local epidemiology.
  • IL-23 inhibitors (as a separate class from IL-12/23) were present in some included studies but were grouped under IL-12/23 for some analyses; mechanism-specific estimates for IL-23 monotherapy may not be fully separable.
  • Substantial heterogeneity (I² = 81%) in biologic LTBI conversion analyses limits the reliability of pooled figures across biologic classes.
Show all 4
  • The paper is a supplemental online content document; forest plot numeric values are described but not fully reproduced in text, so exact subgroup incidence rates by biologic class are not extractable from this source.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the TB reactivation risk with TNF inhibitors versus IL-17 inhibitors in psoriasis patients?How should LTBI screening and prophylaxis be managed before starting biologics in high TB-burden countries?Does ustekinumab carry a lower tuberculosis risk compared to other biologics in dermatologic patients?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Dermatology
Sample Size
n=15,005
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next