ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms…

Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform

JAMA Pediatrics·September 18Open Access
PediatricsLimited evidenceCyberbullyingOnline HarmsTechnology-Related Sleep DisruptionCross-Sectional SurveyAdolescent

Summary

View source

What was studied

A nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 472 US adolescents aged 13–17 assessed the prevalence of self-reported online harms (harassment, sexual solicitation, violent content exposure, and technology-related sleep disruption) across 20 online platforms over the past 4 weeks, conducted February–December 2025.

Key findings

44.7% of adolescents witnessed harassment and 29.8% experienced it directly; online exposure exceeded offline for violent imagery (10.7% vs 1.6%), unwanted sexual images (13.4% vs 2.0%), and self-harm content (9.7% vs 5.2%); over half (51.5%) reported technology-related sleep disruption. Harm prevalence varied meaningfully by platform.

Study limitations

Small pilot sample (n=472 from 47 states) limits precision of platform-level estimates; self-reported outcomes are subject to recall and social desirability bias; cross-sectional design prevents causal inference about platform-specific harms.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should routinely ask adolescents about online experiences—especially exposure to violent or sexual content and technology-related sleep loss—as these harms are common and vary by platform. Screening conversations can mirror public health risk monitoring frameworks already familiar to pediatric practice.

Caveats

  • All outcomes are self-reported, introducing potential recall bias and social desirability effects, particularly for sensitive harms such as sexual solicitation
  • The cross-sectional design cannot establish whether specific platforms cause harm or whether adolescents at higher baseline risk self-select onto certain platforms
  • This is a pilot survey with a relatively small sample (n=472); platform-level prevalence estimates should be interpreted with caution due to limited statistical power for subgroup analyses

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How should pediatricians screen adolescents for online harms and cyberbullying in clinical practice?Which social media platforms are associated with the highest risk of self-harm content exposure in teenagers?What interventions reduce technology-related sleep disruption in adolescents?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Pediatrics
Sample Size
n=472
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next