ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Risk of Relapse and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Risk of Relapse and Efficacy of Adjuvant…

Risk of Relapse and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma

JAMA Surgery·September 9
SurgeryPractice changingAppendiceal AdenocarcinomaRetrospective Cohort StudyAdjuvant ChemotherapyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinicopathologic and genomic factors associated with relapse, and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, in 439 patients with localized (stage I–III) appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) treated at MD Anderson (Jan 2000–Feb 2024; median follow-up 62.6 months), with validation of stage II patients from Memorial Sloan Kettering (n=128).

Key findings

Relapse was uncommon: only 9.4% (19/202) of surgical patients relapsed, with 5-year OS of 95.7% (no relapse) vs 77.2% (relapse; HR 5.50). Mucinous (HR 5.60) and enteric-type (HR 6.60) histologies and T4 disease (HR 3.30) were independently associated with relapse, but adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit on RFS (multivariable HR 0.98, P=.90) or OS (multivariable HR 0.71, P=.53). TP53 mutation in goblet cell tumors (HR 6.93) and GNAS mutation in non-goblet tumors (HR 17.0) flagged higher relapse risk.

Study limitations

Retrospective design with inherent selection bias; adjuvant chemotherapy was likely preferentially given to higher-risk patients, limiting causal interpretation despite multivariable adjustment. Overall relapse rates are low, limiting statistical power for subgroup analyses.

Clinical implications

Routine adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of localized appendiceal adenocarcinoma does not appear to improve survival and should not be standard practice. Risk stratification using histologic subtype (mucinous or enteric-type over goblet cell) and molecular profiling (TP53 in goblet cell, GNAS in non-goblet) can help identify the minority of patients at meaningful relapse risk.

Caveats

  • The impact_flag 'practice_changing' is applied cautiously — while findings argue against routine adjuvant chemotherapy, the retrospective design and potential selection bias in chemotherapy allocation limit definitive conclusions. Prospective validation is needed.
  • The validation cohort from MSKCC was limited to stage II patients only, so external validity for stage I and III is less established.
  • Traditional colorectal cancer risk factors (poor differentiation, perforation, LVI, PNI) were not significantly associated with relapse in this cohort — clinicians should not directly extrapolate colorectal cancer guidelines to appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which patients with localized appendiceal adenocarcinoma are at highest risk of relapse after surgery?Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in stage II or III appendiceal cancer?What is the role of GNAS and TP53 mutations in appendiceal adenocarcinoma prognosis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Surgery
Sample Size
n=439
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next