ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Real‐world effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in giant cell arteritis: an Italian multicentre cohort study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Real‐world effectiveness and safety of s…

Real‐world effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in giant cell arteritis: an Italian multicentre cohort study

Arthritis Care & Research·September 21Open Access
RheumatologyLimited evidenceGiant Cell ArteritisRetrospective Cohort StudyIL-17A InhibitorOlder AdultCosentyxSecukinumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

Real-world effectiveness and safety of secukinumab (IL-17A inhibitor) in 36 GCA patients at 14 Italian centres, most with relapsing disease and prior tocilizumab exposure, followed for at least 6 months.

Key findings

Clinical remission was achieved in ~83% at 12 months; GC-free remission rose progressively to 40% at 12 months (p=0.012); median daily GC dose fell from 8.7 mg to 0 mg (p<0.001); 12-month drug retention was 77%. Adverse events occurred in 56%, with infections in 50% of patients.

Study limitations

Small sample (n=36), retrospective design, no control arm, and most patients were heavily pre-treated (89% relapsers, 72% prior tocilizumab), limiting generalizability; the phase III GCAptAIN trial did not meet its primary endpoint.

Clinical implications

In refractory or relapsing GCA patients who have failed tocilizumab, secukinumab may offer meaningful remission and steroid-sparing benefits, but the high infection rate (50%) warrants close monitoring; consider it a salvage option pending further trial data.

Caveats

  • High infection rate (50% of patients) is a clinically important safety signal in an already immunocompromised, predominantly older adult population
  • Most patients were heavily pre-treated (89% prior relapsers, 72% prior tocilizumab), so results may not apply to biologic-naive GCA patients
  • Only 36 patients enrolled across 14 centres — extremely small sample size limits the reliability of remission and safety estimates
Show all 4
  • The concurrent negative result of the phase III GCAptAIN RCT tempers interpretation of these observational findings

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the current treatment options for relapsing or refractory giant cell arteritis after tocilizumab failure?How does IL-17A inhibition compare to IL-6 inhibition in giant cell arteritis outcomes?What were the results of the phase III GCAptAIN trial of secukinumab in giant cell arteritis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Arthritis Care &amp; Research
Sample Size
n=36
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next