ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Temporal order of clinical, imaging, and…

Temporal order of clinical, imaging, and biomarker changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration–associated syndromes

Alzheimer's & Dementia·August 5Open Access
Clinical NeurologyPractice changingBehavioral Variant Frontotemporal DementiaCorticobasal SyndromeFrontotemporal Lobar DegenerationFTD-ALSPrimary Progressive AphasiaProgressive Supranuclear PalsyRetrospective Longitudinal Cohort StudyMRI VolumetryNeuropsychological AssessmentPlasma BiomarkerAdultGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurofilament Light Chain

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective longitudinal study modeled the temporal ordering of 10 multimodal biomarkers (plasma GFAP, plasma NfL, WMH volume, insular/frontal/gray matter atrophy on MRI, TMT-A, TMT-B, FBI, CDR-SoB) in 489 patients across the sporadic FTLD spectrum (bvFTD, PPA, CBS, PSP, FTD-ALS) over 1,904 patient-visit observations, using sigmoid trajectory modeling.

Key findings

Plasma GFAP departed from normality earliest (most gradual, pre-symptomatic trajectory), followed by TMT-B (earliest inflection point, θ = 0.3 years; only biomarker significantly abnormal 10–5 years before symptom onset), WMH volume, and plasma NfL. Insula atrophy had the steepest MRI transition (Smax = 0.137 pooled; 0.200 in PPA); CDR-SoB declined most steeply overall (Smax = 0.200). The cascade ordering was robust across 91% of biomarker pairs (precedence probability ≥0.80) and stable in non-carriers of pathogenic variants (Spearman ρ = 0.93).

Study limitations

- Most participants were assessed at or after symptom onset, so pre-symptomatic trajectory estimates are model extrapolations (sigmoid assumptions) with wide confidence intervals, not direct observations. - Single-center design limits generalizability. - CBS, PSP, and FTD-ALS subgroups were too small for standalone cascade analyses; early biomarker positions are most firmly established for cortical phenotypes (bvFTD, PPA).

Clinical implications

Combining plasma GFAP with executive function testing (TMT-B) may offer the earliest detectable signal in sporadic FTLD, making them promising screening tools for prodromal disease. Biomarker sensitivity varies by disease stage and phenotype, so clinical trial designs should stratify by FTLD syndrome and target stage-specific endpoints.

Caveats

  • CBS, PSP, and FTD-ALS subgroups were too small for independent cascade modeling; generalization of results to motor-predominant FTLD syndromes is limited.
  • Plasma GFAP and NfL trajectories were flagged as non-monotonic in mixed-effects fitting (minor deviation <0.001 normalized units/time step); their early cascade positions are descriptive, not strictly sigmoidal, and require prospective confirmation.
  • Pre-symptomatic biomarker trajectories are model extrapolations based on sigmoid parametric assumptions, not direct observations — early estimates should be interpreted with caution.
Show all 5
  • The cohort includes 104 pathogenic variant carriers (GRN, C9orf72, TARDBP, MAPT, etc.); while excluding them did not materially alter ordering, the label 'sporadic FTLD' may be imprecise given this genetic admixture.
  • The impact_flag 'practice_changing' was assigned because this is the first data-driven multimodal biomarker cascade for sporadic FTLD, offering a framework for trial design and early detection — but clinical implementation awaits prospective validation.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the earliest biomarker for detecting prodromal frontotemporal dementia?How does plasma GFAP compare to NfL for staging FTLD progression?How should clinical trial endpoints be selected for different FTLD phenotypes like bvFTD versus PPA?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Alzheimer's &amp; Dementia
Sample Size
n=489
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next