ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Impact of Dual Interleukin‐17A and Inter…

Impact of Dual Interleukin‐17A and Interleukin‐17F Inhibition with Bimekizumab on Inflammatory and Structural Lesions in Axial Spondyloarthritis: MRI and Radiographic Outcomes from the Phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and 2 Studies and their Open‐Label Extension

Arthritis & Rheumatology·September 14Open Access
RheumatologyPractice changingAxial SpondyloarthritisNon-Radiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisRadiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial With Open-Label ExtensionIL-17A/IL-17F InhibitorAdultBimekizumabBimekizumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study evaluated bimekizumab (dual IL-17A/IL-17F inhibitor, 160 mg SC every 4 weeks) vs. placebo on MRI inflammation/structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint and spine, and radiographic progression, in adults with nr-axSpA (BE MOBILE 1) and r-axSpA (BE MOBILE 2) over 104 weeks, including a 52-week open-label extension.

Key findings

By Week 52, bimekizumab reduced SIJ inflammation (SPARCC SIJ mean CfB: −7.6 nr-axSpA, −5.1 r-axSpA), spine inflammation (Berlin spine CfB: −0.5 nr-axSpA, −2.5 r-axSpA), and SIJ erosion scores (−1.8 both subtypes), with increased backfill and fat lesion scores; at Week 104, radiographic progression was minimal (mNY CfB: 0.03 in nr-axSpA; mSASSS CfB: 0.3 in r-axSpA).

Study limitations

- Observed case data only (no imputation), which may overestimate benefit in completers. - No direct comparator arm at Week 104 (all patients received bimekizumab after Week 16). - MRI sub-studies represent a subset of the full trial populations, limiting generalizability.

Clinical implications

Bimekizumab produces meaningful reductions in SIJ and spinal MRI inflammation and erosion in both nr-axSpA and r-axSpA, with very little radiographic progression at 2 years—supporting its use as a disease-modifying option across the axSpA spectrum.

Caveats

  • MRI outcomes are from sub-studies, not the full trial population—sub-study N values were not provided.
  • Sample size (total N) was not explicitly reported in the abstract or results section; the tag has been omitted accordingly.
  • Study publication date (2026-09-14) is recent; this is a newly published paper and independent replication has not yet been assessed.
Show all 4
  • The open-label extension lacks a placebo control arm after Week 16, making long-term comparative efficacy inference uncertain.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does bimekizumab compare to other IL-17 inhibitors for axial spondyloarthritis MRI outcomes?What is the evidence for radiographic progression inhibition in nr-axSpA with biologic therapy?How do SPARCC SIJ and Berlin spine scores change with IL-17 inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next