ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Association Between Diaphragm Ultrasound Measures and Extubation Outcomes in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Association Between Diaphragm Ultrasound…

Association Between Diaphragm Ultrasound Measures and Extubation Outcomes in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Pediatric Pulmonology·August 25Open Access
Respiratory SystemLimited evidenceDiaphragm DysfunctionExtubation FailureRespiratory Distress SyndromeSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisDiaphragm UltrasonographyNeonate

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review and prognostic meta-analysis evaluated whether diaphragm ultrasound measures — thickening fraction, end-expiratory thickness, and excursion — taken before planned extubation could predict extubation failure in mechanically ventilated neonates (≤28 days old), pooling 7 prospective cohort studies (n=255) published 2021–2026.

Key findings

Extubation failure occurred in 90/255 neonates (35%). Neonates who failed had significantly lower diaphragm thickening fraction (pooled MD = −9.51%; 95% CI: −14.73 to −4.29; p=0.0004; I²=0%). Diaphragm thickness (MD = −0.09 mm; p=0.171; I²=83.2%) and excursion (MD = −0.56 mm; p=0.073; I²=70.4%) were not significantly different between groups. GRADE certainty was moderate for thickening fraction and very low for thickness and excursion.

Study limitations

- Moderate-to-high risk of bias across all studies, driven mainly by inadequate adjustment for confounders (gestational age, illness severity, ventilatory settings). - Substantial variability in extubation failure definitions (72 h to 7 days), timing of ultrasound, and ventilatory support conditions during image acquisition limits between-study comparability. - Only 7 small studies (total n=255); formal publication bias assessment was not feasible, and findings cannot be generalized to neonates with congenital or neuromuscular conditions.

Clinical implications

A lower diaphragm thickening fraction before extubation is associated with extubation failure in neonates, but do not yet use it as a standalone decision-making tool — measurement protocols need standardization and prospective validation before routine clinical use.

Caveats

  • No diagnostic accuracy metrics (e.g., AUC, sensitivity, specificity, or optimal thresholds) were synthesized — the meta-analysis reports only mean differences, so clinical cut-offs cannot be derived from this review.
  • One included study (de Alencar Nelo et al. 2025) originally enrolled infants aged 0–2 years; neonatal-only data were obtained directly from authors, introducing potential selection uncertainty.
  • Only 7 studies with a total of 255 neonates were included; the evidence base is small and meta-regression results should be interpreted cautiously.
Show all 4
  • The predominant population was preterm and very-low-birth-weight neonates; findings may not generalize to term neonates or those with congenital anomalies, who were excluded.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What diaphragm thickening fraction threshold predicts extubation success in preterm neonates?How does lung ultrasound compare to diaphragm ultrasound for predicting extubation readiness in the NICU?What are the best objective tools for assessing extubation readiness in mechanically ventilated neonates?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Pediatric Pulmonology
Sample Size
n=255
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next