ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Contemporary Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Outcomes: A Multicentre National Cohort Study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Contemporary Fibrotic Interstitial Lung…

Contemporary Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Outcomes: A Multicentre National Cohort Study

Respirology·September 7Open Access
Respiratory SystemConfirms priorConnective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung DiseaseFibrotic Hypersensitivity PneumonitisIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisUnclassifiable Interstitial Lung DiseaseProspective Cohort StudyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

Transplant-free survival and prognostic factors were assessed in 4,236 adults with fibrotic ILD (IPF, CTD-ILD, fHP, uILD) prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF), with outcomes tracked at 1, 3, and 5 years from enrollment. Performance of the ILD-GAP index was also evaluated.

Key findings

Overall transplant-free survival was 91% at 1 year, 72% at 3 years, and 57% at 5 years. IPF had the worst outcomes (87%, 61%, 39%), while CTD-ILD had the best (95%, 81%, 70%; adjusted HR vs. IPF: 0.64 [95% CI 0.55–0.76]). The ILD-GAP index showed moderate discrimination (Harrell's C = 0.75 at 1 year, 0.73 at 3 years).

Study limitations

Registry-based observational design limits causal inference. Enrollment was used as time zero, which may introduce selection bias toward patients already engaged in specialist care. The ILD-GAP index showed only moderate discrimination, suggesting prognostic gaps remain.

Clinical implications

CTD-ILD carries meaningfully better long-term prognosis than IPF — roughly twice the 5-year transplant-free survival (70% vs. 39%) — reinforcing the importance of accurate ILD subtyping. The ILD-GAP index performs modestly in contemporary cohorts and should not be used alone for major clinical decisions.

Caveats

  • fHP (fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis) subgroup represents only 9% of the cohort; subgroup-specific estimates may have wider uncertainty.
  • No drug or therapeutic intervention was evaluated; modality, brand, and generic tags were omitted as not applicable.
  • The study population is Canadian and registry-based, which may limit generalizability to other healthcare systems or ILD referral patterns.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does survival in CTD-ILD compare to IPF over 5 years in real-world registries?What are the limitations of the ILD-GAP index for predicting prognosis in fibrotic ILD?Which baseline factors are most strongly associated with death or transplant in fibrotic interstitial lung disease?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Respirology
Sample Size
n=4,236
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next