ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Trends and disparities in DXA testing fo…

Trends and disparities in DXA testing for osteoporosis among Medicare beneficiaries, 2005–2023

Osteoporosis International·August 6
Endocrinology & MetabolismSafety signalOsteoporosisRepeated Cross-Sectional StudyBone DensitometryOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This 19-year repeated cross-sectional study used 5% Medicare fee-for-service claims (2005–2023) to examine trends in DXA utilization among 5,243,098 unique beneficiaries, stratified by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (Area Deprivation Index), urbanicity, and patient acuity (Neiman Imaging Comorbidity Index).

Key findings

Annual DXA use fell 35.4% overall (7,255 to 4,690 per 100,000 beneficiaries). Hispanic beneficiaries had the steepest drop in adjusted odds of DXA use (AOR 0.93 → 0.60; −35.3%), while the highest-acuity patients (NICI ≥ 7) saw the largest increase (AOR 1.11 → 1.70; +57.7%). Socioeconomically deprived and rural groups also showed disproportionately larger declines.

Study limitations

- Study is limited to fee-for-service Medicare; findings may not generalize to Medicare Advantage or younger populations. - Claims data cannot capture patient-level reasons for not receiving DXA (e.g., patient refusal, guideline changes, provider bias). - Race/ethnicity coding in claims data may misclassify some individuals.

Clinical implications

Overall DXA use has fallen sharply since 2005, but the burden falls hardest on Hispanic patients and those in socioeconomically deprived areas—groups already at risk for undetected osteoporosis. Clinicians should proactively identify and screen these patients, and health systems should audit DXA referral patterns for equity gaps.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence assigned as 3 (retrospective cohort/cross-sectional with large administrative data); no comparator intervention was tested.
  • Sex-disaggregated DXA rates are not explicitly reported in the available abstract text; the mixed-sex tag reflects the overall study population.
  • The embedded full-text PDF appears to be a 2020 CMS report on Medicare Advantage disparities—a different document from the 2026 Osteoporosis International article described in the abstract and results. Summary is based solely on the abstract, results, and DOI metadata, not the full-text pages.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which Medicare populations are most at risk for missed osteoporosis screening and why?How have USPSTF guideline changes affected DXA utilization trends over time?What interventions have been shown to reduce racial and socioeconomic disparities in osteoporosis screening?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Osteoporosis International
Sample Size
n=5,243,098
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next