ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Diagnostic accuracy of a self-administer…

Diagnostic accuracy of a self-administered digital cognitive test battery for differentiating early Alzheimer’s disease from controls

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience·August 17Open Access
PsychiatryLimited evidenceAlzheimer'S DiseaseMild Cognitive ImpairmentCross-Sectional StudyDigital Cognitive AssessmentOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This cross-sectional pilot study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BraincheX — a self-administered digital cognitive test battery — for distinguishing early Alzheimer's disease (AD; n=25, MCI or mild dementia, amyloid-positive) from cognitively healthy controls (n=31, amyloid-negative) recruited from the LMU Munich memory clinic (October 2024–February 2025), using ROC analysis against the CERAD-Plus as a reference standard.

Key findings

BraincheX total score achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76–0.95), sensitivity 89.7%, and specificity 68.0% at a cut-off of −1.51; it correlated strongly with the CERAD-Plus total score (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) and showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84), comparable to CERAD-Plus (AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76–0.97).

Study limitations

- Small sample (N=54 analyzed) with normative data derived from only 29 controls, limiting reliability of demographic adjustments. - Cut-off was derived and evaluated in the same sample with no internal validation (e.g., bootstrap), inflating apparent performance. - CERAD-Plus and BraincheX were administered an average of 4.9 months apart (range 0–12 months), introducing temporal confounding in convergent validity estimates.

Clinical implications

BraincheX shows promise as a digital, non-verbal screening tool for early AD, with sensitivity comparable to CERAD-Plus and the advantage of automated scoring and reduced examiner burden. However, it should not replace a full clinical workup, and independent validation in larger, diverse cohorts is needed before routine clinical use.

Caveats

  • Medotrax GmbH provided the software free of charge; no formal conflict-of-interest was declared, but this relationship warrants transparency when interpreting results.
  • No brand tag was applied as 'BraincheX' is a proprietary product name of Medotrax GmbH; the device is not an approved drug and does not map to standard brand/generic tag categories.
  • The BraincheX Clock Drawing Test was not scored by the automated algorithm in this study — it was rated manually — which partially limits the 'fully automated' claim.
Show all 5
  • The cut-off score (−1.51) was both derived and validated in the same small sample without cross-validation, so sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (68.0%) are likely optimistic estimates. Independent replication is needed.
  • This is a secondary analysis of a registered study (NCT06711952); the primary study protocol focused on SCD-Q validation, which may introduce selection bias.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How do digital cognitive screening tools compare to CERAD-Plus for detecting early Alzheimer's disease?What is the diagnostic accuracy of self-administered cognitive tests for MCI and early dementia?How can digital cognitive batteries reduce examiner bias in memory clinic settings?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Sample Size
n=56
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next