ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Stroke secondary to cancer-associated co…

Stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review

Journal of Neurology·September 20Open Access
Clinical NeurologyConfirms priorCancer-Associated CoagulopathyIschemic StrokeNon-Bacterial Thrombotic EndocarditisSystematic ReviewAntiplatelet TherapyDirect Oral AnticoagulantLow-Molecular-Weight HeparinAdultApixabanEdoxabanEnoxaparinWarfarin

Summary

View source

What was studied

This PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review synthesized evidence from 82 studies (2000–2025) on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological features, pathophysiology, biomarkers, and treatment strategies of ischemic stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy (CAC) in patients with solid tumors.

Key findings

CAC-related stroke occurs most often within 6 months of cancer diagnosis, is predominantly cryptogenic (~40–51%), and is strongly linked to adenocarcinoma (especially lung and pancreatic). The hallmark MRI pattern is multi-territory infarcts in >2 vascular territories ('three territories sign'). D-dimer is the most consistent biomarker for recurrence and mortality. Thirty-day mortality ranges from 25–50%, cumulative stroke recurrence reaches 16% at 6 months, and 75%+ of survivors at 3 months have mRS ≥3.

Study limitations

- Evidence base is predominantly retrospective and observational (57 retrospective, 21 prospective cohorts; only 2 RCTs), limiting causal inference and treatment conclusions. - No quantitative meta-analysis was possible due to marked heterogeneity in study design, CAC definitions, D-dimer assay platforms/units, and outcome measures. - Review protocol was not prospectively registered (PROSPERO), and only English- and Spanish-language studies were included, introducing possible reporting and language bias.

Clinical implications

In any patient with cryptogenic stroke and multi-territory DWI infarcts, especially with adenocarcinoma (lung or pancreatic), check D-dimer early—levels ≥5.5 µg/mL carry >99% specificity for cancer-associated stroke and should prompt urgent malignancy workup. For secondary prevention, LMWH or a DOAC is preferred over warfarin; use LMWH first-line in GI malignancies given higher DOAC bleeding risk.

Caveats

  • 30-day mortality of 25–50% underscores that even with optimal antithrombotic therapy, prognosis remains poor and goals-of-care discussions are important early in management
  • D-dimer thresholds vary across studies due to differences in assay platforms and reporting units (FEU vs. DDU), making direct cross-study comparison and a universal cutoff unreliable
  • Hematologic malignancies were excluded; findings apply specifically to solid tumors and may not generalize to lymphoma, leukemia, or myeloproliferative neoplasms
Show all 4
  • Only 2 randomized controlled trials were included among 82 studies; treatment recommendations are based largely on observational data and cannot be considered definitive

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the best anticoagulant for secondary stroke prevention in patients with active cancer?How does the 'three territories sign' on MRI help identify cancer-associated stroke?Which D-dimer threshold should trigger cancer screening after cryptogenic stroke?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Neurology
Sample Size
n=82
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next