ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-an…

SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of FLIP/impedance planimetry in the surgical work-up and management of GERD, achalasia, and gastroparesis

Surgical Endoscopy·July 31
SurgeryLimited evidenceAchalasiaGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseGastroparesisSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisFunctional Lumen Imaging ProbeImpedance PlanimetryMixedEndoFLIP

Summary

View source

What was studied

This SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic and clinical utility of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP/impedance planimetry) across four clinical questions: preoperative FLIP vs. high-resolution manometry (HRM) before anti-reflux surgery, intraoperative FLIP vs. standard technique during anti-reflux surgery, intraoperative FLIP vs. standard technique during myotomy, and preoperative FLIP vs. standard care before pylorus-directed therapy for gastroparesis (literature through June 24, 2025).

Key findings

For achalasia screening before anti-reflux surgery, FLIP showed high sensitivity (1.00; 95% CI 0.98–1.00) but low specificity (0.52; 95% CI 0.38–0.66). Intraoperative FLIP during myotomy was associated with higher symptom resolution (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.09–10.93), while intraoperative use during anti-reflux surgery showed little to no difference in dysphagia, reflux recurrence, gas bloating, or quality of life. No comparative data existed for gastroparesis applications.

Study limitations

- Overall certainty of evidence is low to very low (GRADE), based entirely on comparative observational studies with no RCTs included. - No comparative studies were identified for the gastroparesis key question, leaving this clinical area unevaluated. - Long-term outcome data for FLIP-guided decisions are limited across all clinical contexts.

Clinical implications

FLIP is a highly sensitive but nonspecific screening tool for achalasia prior to anti-reflux surgery; it may improve outcomes when used intraoperatively during myotomy, but surgeons should not expect benefit during routine anti-reflux surgery. Given very low certainty evidence, FLIP should complement—not replace—standard workup until prospective trials clarify its role.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence tagged as 3 reflects the best available study design (systematic review of observational studies); GRADE certainty is rated low to very low by the authors.
  • No randomized controlled trials were included; all evidence is from comparative observational studies, which limits causal inference.
  • The gastroparesis key question yielded zero comparative studies, making any conclusions for that indication premature.
Show all 4
  • Total sample size is not reported as a single pooled N in the abstract; individual meta-analyses vary by key question.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the sensitivity and specificity of FLIP compared to high-resolution manometry for diagnosing achalasia before anti-reflux surgery?Does intraoperative EndoFLIP use improve outcomes after POEM or Heller myotomy for achalasia?What is the role of impedance planimetry in guiding pyloric intervention for gastroparesis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next