ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Fundus-first dissection: a salvage technique for the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Fundus-first dissection: a salvage techn…

Fundus-first dissection: a salvage technique for the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy·August 24
SurgeryConfirms priorCholecystitisCholelithiasisDifficult Laparoscopic CholecystectomyRetrospective Cohort StudyLaparoscopic SurgeryAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study evaluated the safety and outcomes of fundus-first dissection (FFD) as a salvage technique in 159 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (Nassar Difficulty Grades 4–5) where the critical view of safety (CVS) could not be achieved via antegrade dissection, drawn from a single-surgeon prospective database spanning 1992–2022.

Key findings

Zero bile duct injuries occurred in 159 FFD cases. Total cholecystectomy was achieved in 96.9%; subtotal cholecystectomy and open conversion were each required in 3.1%. Adverse outcomes were independently driven by ASA ≥ 3 and Grade 5 difficulty — not the FFD technique itself — and conversions fell 35-fold over three decades.

Study limitations

Single-surgeon, single-centre series spanning 30 years limits generalisability; retrospective outcome analysis introduces selection bias; external validation in broader surgical populations has not yet been performed.

Clinical implications

When CVS cannot be achieved in a Grade 4–5 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, FFD appears safe in experienced hands — with no bile duct injuries and a 96.9% total cholecystectomy rate. Surgeons should not attribute adverse outcomes to FFD itself; ASA status and anatomical complexity are the key risk drivers.

Caveats

  • Sex distribution is not explicitly reported in the abstract; 'mixed' is inferred as typical for a cholecystitis cohort.
  • Study spans 30 years (1992–2022), so early-era cases may not reflect current surgical standards or technology, which could affect temporal generalisability.
  • The sample size tag reflects the total Grade 4–5 LC cohort (n=1065); the FFD subgroup is n=159. The level of evidence is assigned as 3 (retrospective cohort) despite a prospectively maintained database, due to retrospective outcome analysis and single-surgeon design.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the safest bailout options when critical view of safety cannot be achieved during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?How does subtotal cholecystectomy compare to fundus-first dissection for difficult gallbladders?What preoperative factors predict conversion to open surgery in high-grade difficulty laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Sample Size
n=1,065
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next