ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Prognosis-predicting factor of gastrecto…

Prognosis-predicting factor of gastrectomy after systemic cancer therapy for cStage IVB gastric cancer

Gastric Cancer·August 26
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingGastric CancerMetastatic Gastric CancerRetrospective Cohort StudyChemotherapyGastrectomyImmunotherapySystemic Cancer TherapyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This single-center retrospective study (2013–2023) evaluated outcomes of gastrectomy after systemic cancer therapy in 121 cStage IVB gastric cancer patients (79 oligometastatic, 42 polymetastatic) to identify prognostic factors for postoperative survival.

Key findings

3-year OS was 65% overall; oligometastatic disease outperformed polymetastatic (76% vs. 43%, p=0.009). Major pathological response (MPR, seen in 32%) strongly predicted survival in both groups (oligometastatic 97%, polymetastatic 89%). Patients without clinical complete response and without MPR had 3-year OS of only 50%.

Study limitations

- Single-center retrospective design limits generalizability and introduces selection bias (only 7.6% of treated patients underwent gastrectomy). - No randomized control group; outcomes for comparable patients who did not undergo surgery are not reported. - The definition of oligometastatic vs. polymetastatic disease was center-specific and not validated externally.

Clinical implications

For stage IVB gastric cancer, surgical decision-making should go beyond technical resectability — pretreatment metastatic burden and depth of response (especially major pathological response) are key prognostic filters. Gastrectomy after systemic therapy may be appropriate in oligometastatic responders but offers limited benefit in polymetastatic patients without MPR.

Caveats

  • Sex distribution of the 121 surgical patients is not explicitly reported in the abstract; 'mixed' is assumed based on the general gastric cancer population.
  • Specific systemic therapy regimens used (e.g., chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy plus immunotherapy) are referenced in background but not stratified in the reported outcomes, which may confound survival comparisons across the study period (2013–2023).
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing is applied cautiously — this is a single-center retrospective study, so findings are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. The flag reflects the clinical importance of the decision framework proposed, not a confirmed practice change.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What defines major pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer and how is it measured?Is conversion surgery beneficial for polymetastatic gastric cancer after chemotherapy plus immunotherapy?How does oligometastatic vs polymetastatic disease status affect outcomes in stage IV gastric cancer treatment?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Gastric Cancer
Sample Size
n=121
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next