ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Associations Between Frequency, Motivati…

Associations Between Frequency, Motivations, and Problematic Pornography Use and Sexual Well-Being: A Dyadic Prospective Study Among Couples

Archives of Sexual Behavior·September 15
Psychology, ClinicalConfirms priorProblematic Pornography UseSexual DysfunctionProspective Cohort StudyBehavioral AssessmentAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This dyadic prospective study examined how pornography use frequency, eight pornography use motivations (PUMs), and problematic pornography use (PPU) predict sexual well-being (satisfaction, function, distress, partnered sexual frequency) in 309 couples (618 individuals) over one year, with gender as a moderator.

Key findings

Men's higher sexual pleasure and self-exploration PUMs were linked to better sexual function for both themselves and their partners one year later, while women's and gender-diverse individuals' PPU was associated with their partner's lower sexual function at follow-up; associations were gender-specific and included notable partner (crossover) effects.

Study limitations

The sample was self-selected and largely recruited online, limiting generalizability; the analysis plan deviated from preregistration (e.g., switching from latent growth curve to cross-lagged models, adding post-hoc Benjamini–Hochberg correction); gender-diverse individuals (2%) were grouped with women, limiting conclusions about this subgroup.

Clinical implications

Clinicians working with couples should assess not just whether a partner uses pornography, but why they use it and whether use is problematic — especially since a partner's PPU can affect the other partner's sexual function. Gender-sensitive, couple-level conversations about pornography are warranted in sexual health practice.

Caveats

  • Cross-lagged panel models have known interpretive limitations and do not establish causal directionality despite the prospective design
  • Gender-diverse individuals (only ~2% of sample) were grouped analytically with women, so findings cannot be generalized to gender-diverse people specifically
  • The analytical approach deviated from the preregistered plan in several ways (model type, moderators tested, multiple-comparison correction), which should be considered when interpreting results
Show all 4
  • The sample was self-selected and recruited online, which may overrepresent individuals comfortable discussing pornography use and limit generalizability to the broader population

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does problematic pornography use affect a partner's sexual function in couples?What motivations for pornography use are linked to better or worse sexual outcomes?Dyadic approaches to assessing pornography use in couples therapy

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Sample Size
n=618
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next