ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Predictors of Steroid Failure and Outcom…

Predictors of Steroid Failure and Outcomes of Rescue Therapy in Severe ICI-Induced Colitis: A Multicenter Study from GETECCU

Digestive Diseases and Sciences·July 29
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced ColitisImmune-Mediated ColitisMulticenter Retrospective Cohort StudyAnti-IL-12/23Anti-IntegrinAnti-TNFCorticosteroidAdultEntyvioRemicadeStelaraInfliximabUstekinumabVedolizumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This multicenter retrospective study (GETECCU, 2014–2024) evaluated predictors of IV corticosteroid failure and outcomes of biologic rescue therapy in 211 hospitalized adults with grade 3–4 immune checkpoint inhibitor–induced colitis (IMC).

Key findings

Corticosteroids worked in only 50.2% of patients. Independent predictors of steroid failure were prior oral corticosteroid use (OR 4.4), higher UCEIS score (OR 1.31), and higher modified Mayo score (OR 1.45). Among the 113 rescue therapy courses given (infliximab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab), effectiveness rates were 65–72%; greater clinical severity was the only factor tied to worse rescue response.

Study limitations

- Retrospective design limits causal inference and may introduce selection bias. - Rescue therapy choice (infliximab vs. vedolizumab vs. ustekinumab) was not randomized, so head-to-head comparisons between biologics are not possible. - Full-text data are behind a paywall; detailed subgroup results and safety data were not available for review.

Clinical implications

In severe ICI-induced colitis, patients who had prior outpatient steroids, high symptom scores, or endoscopic ulcerations are unlikely to respond to IV corticosteroids—consider early escalation to biologic therapy for these patients. Symptom severity at presentation should also guide expectations for biologic rescue response.

Caveats

  • Full text was not accessible; summary relies on abstract and publisher page text only — detailed subgroup data, safety outcomes, and survival data could not be verified.
  • Impact flag 'practice_changing' assigned cautiously given retrospective design and moderate sample size; prospective validation is pending.
  • The 65–72% effectiveness range for rescue therapies is reported as an aggregate across infliximab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab; individual agent response rates are not separately confirmed from available text.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which biologic is most effective for steroid-refractory ICI-induced colitis — infliximab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab?How should I use UCEIS score to guide early biologic escalation in immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis?What are the current ASCO and ESMO guidelines for managing grade 3-4 immune-mediated colitis from immunotherapy?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Sample Size
n=211
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next