ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Further Evaluation of Sibling Aggression among Elementary School Age Youth
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Further Evaluation of Sibling Aggression…

Further Evaluation of Sibling Aggression among Elementary School Age Youth

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment·September 2
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceProactive AggressionReactive AggressionSibling AggressionCross-Sectional StudyChild

Summary

View source

What was studied

This cross-sectional study examined item-level frequencies of proactive and reactive sibling aggression in 290 elementary-aged children (grades 3–5, mean age 9.27 years, 54.8% male), and tested for gender and grade-level differences in sibling aggression acts.

Key findings

Reactive sibling aggression was more common than proactive aggression; the most frequent act was getting angry and striking when teased by a sibling. At least 1 in 6 youth (≥17%) reported using physical force to dominate siblings. No gender differences were found; the only grade-level difference was that 3rd graders were more likely than 5th graders to threaten or bully a sibling to get their own way.

Study limitations

- Cross-sectional design prevents causal or longitudinal conclusions. - Sample is limited to grades 3–5, so findings may not generalize outside this age range. - Full text was not accessible; detailed measurement tools, sample demographics, and effect sizes could not be verified.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should routinely ask about sibling aggression — especially reactive forms — during behavioral assessments of school-age children, as it is common and linked to broader emotional and behavioral problems. Framing sibling aggression as a meaningful risk factor, not a harmless norm, may prompt earlier intervention.

Caveats

  • Full text was behind a paywall; summary is based solely on the abstract and reference list — effect sizes, specific measurement instruments, and full demographic details could not be confirmed.
  • Level of evidence assigned as '4' (cross-sectional study); no control group or longitudinal follow-up was present.
  • Study design label 'Cross-Sectional Study' is inferred from the abstract; the paper does not explicitly state this term.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the long-term outcomes of sibling aggression in childhood on adolescent mental health?How does reactive versus proactive aggression in siblings differ from peer aggression in school-age children?What interventions are effective for reducing sibling aggression in elementary-aged children?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Sample Size
n=290
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next