ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Development and internal validation of a…

Development and internal validation of a prediction model for sleep apnea syndrome treated with continuous positive airway pressure based on claims and health checkup data linked to personal health records

Sleep and Breathing·June 9Open Access
Respiratory SystemConfirms priorObstructive Sleep ApneaSleep Apnea SyndromePrediction Model Development And Internal ValidationContinuous Positive Airway PressureAdultContinuous Positive Airway Pressure

Summary

View source

What was studied

A LightGBM prediction model for sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) treated with CPAP was developed and internally validated using Japanese insurance claims, annual health checkup data, and personal health records (PHRs from the Pep Up platform) across 1,858,566 individuals with 18,692,873 observations from January 2022 to July 2024.

Key findings

The model achieved an AUROC of 0.898 (95% CI 0.895–0.901). Positive predictive values in the top 1% and 10% of predicted risk were 28.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Male sex, age, BMI, and waist circumference were the top predictors. Adding PHR data improved IDI by 1.07% in light users and 4.57% in heavy users.

Study limitations

- Outcome was CPAP-treated SAS only (prevalence 1.6%), excluding undiagnosed or untreated SAS; model performance may be overestimated due to healthcare-access bias. - Population was limited to Japanese company employees and Pep Up users, limiting generalizability. - Internal validation only; external validation in other populations has not been performed.

Clinical implications

This model can flag high-risk individuals for PSG or home sleep testing using routinely collected data, without added testing burden. Clinicians should consider sex-specific thresholds, given marked SAS underdiagnosis in women (prevalence 0.2% vs. 2.4% in men).

Caveats

  • Internal validation only — no external cohort tested; real-world performance in non-Japanese or non-employee populations is unknown.
  • LightGBM model with 279 variables; monotonic constraints were applied for clinical interpretability, but full transparency of the model is limited without external publication of all variable details.
  • Outcome definition (CPAP-treated SAS) likely misses a large proportion of true SAS cases, particularly in women, which may inflate apparent model specificity.
Show all 4
  • Study funded partly by JMDC Inc., whose employees are co-authors; potential conflict of interest noted.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the most accurate prediction models for obstructive sleep apnea in the general population?How do personal health records and wearable data improve sleep apnea screening tools?What is the rate of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea in women and how can it be addressed?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Sleep and Breathing
Sample Size
n=1,858,566
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next