ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. A global consensus on the critical care…

A global consensus on the critical care management of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients: the APASL ACLF Beijing Position Paper

Hepatology International·July 30Open Access
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingAcute Kidney InjuryAcute-On-Chronic Liver FailureAlcohol-Associated Liver DiseaseHepatic EncephalopathyHepatorenal SyndromeMetabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver DiseaseClinical Practice Guideline / Consensus StatementAntibiotic TherapyAntifungal TherapyArtificial Liver Support SystemLiver TransplantationNutritional SupportPlasma ExchangeRenal Replacement TherapyVasopressor TherapyAdultAlbuminEchinocandinsLiposomal Amphotericin BNoradrenalineRifaximinTerlipressinVoriconazole

Summary

View source

What was studied

This APASL consensus position paper, developed by 109 global experts using the GRADE system, establishes standardized critical care management recommendations for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). It covers ICU triage, organ-specific support (liver, kidney, brain, cardiac), infection management, bridging therapies (plasma exchange, artificial liver support), nutrition, and liver transplantation selection and timing.

Key findings

The paper delivers 104 position statements. Key actionable outputs include: use of AARC, CLIF-C ACLF, and GIC scores for ICU transfer decisions (strong, high LoE); terlipressin + albumin as first-line for HRS-AKI (strong, high LoE); CRRT preferred over intermittent RRT in hemodynamically unstable ACLF (weak, low LoE); MAP target 65–75 mmHg with lactate <2 mmol/L in shock (strong, high LoE); viscoelastic tests (TEG/ROTEM) over conventional INR to guide transfusion (strong, moderate LoE); plasma exchange as a bridge to transplant in selected patients without infection, shock, or ventilation (moderate LoE); and transplantation ideally within 30 days of listing (strong, moderate LoE).

Study limitations

- Several recommendations rest on regional (Asia-Pacific or European) data and may not generalize globally. - Some statements carry strong recommendations despite low-certainty evidence, with justifications provided only in supplementary material. - No patient or public involvement in consensus development.

Clinical implications

Use serial prognostic scoring (AARC, CLIF-C ACLF) at days 0, 3, 7, and 14 to guide ICU-level care and transplant listing; prioritize early terlipressin + albumin for HRS-AKI, viscoelastic testing over INR for bleeding decisions, and targeted antibiotic de-escalation at 24–48 hours when cultures are negative. For alcohol-related ACLF Grade III, withhold transplant listing if active infection, inability to achieve pre-transplant abstinence, or absent psychosocial support are present.

Caveats

  • Evidence base is geographically skewed toward Europe (35.6%) and Asia-Pacific (34.7%); African, Latin American, and Middle Eastern data are underrepresented, limiting global applicability.
  • Several strong recommendations are based on low-certainty evidence, with rationale in supplementary files not fully reproduced in the main text.
  • The APASL ACLF definition (acute hepatic insult in chronic liver disease) differs from EASL-CLIF and AASLD definitions; some recommendations may not translate across definitional frameworks.
Show all 4
  • This is a consensus/position paper, not a primary clinical trial; the 'sample size' tag reflects the expert panel size, not a patient cohort.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

When should ACLF patients be transferred to the ICU based on prognostic scores?How do I manage hepatorenal syndrome-AKI in ACLF with terlipressin and albumin?What are the criteria for liver transplantation in alcohol-related ACLF Grade III?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Hepatology International
Sample Size
n=109
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next