ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Fidelity of Mindfulness Training and Delivery for Adolescent Mental and Metabolic Health
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Fidelity of Mindfulness Training and Del…

Fidelity of Mindfulness Training and Delivery for Adolescent Mental and Metabolic Health

Mindfulness·September 3Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceDepressionMental HealthStressAssessment Tool / Methodological FrameworkMindfulness-Based Cognitive TherapyMindfulness-Based InterventionMindfulness-Based Stress ReductionMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

This document describes the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI-TAC), a structured tool developed by Bangor, Exeter, and Oxford universities to assess the adherence and competence of MBSR and MBCT teachers across six domains, for use in training programs and research trials.

Key findings

The MBI-TAC defines six competence domains (curriculum coverage, relational skills, embodiment, practice guidance, interactive teaching, and group facilitation), each rated on a 1–6 scale from 'Incompetent' to 'Advanced,' adapted from the Dreyfus Scale of Competence.

Study limitations

The MBI-TAC cannot capture the full picture of a teacher's competence from a single observation; some key qualities (e.g., reflective capacity, inner process) are not assessable via direct observation alone. Reliability depends heavily on assessor training and familiarity with the specific MBI curriculum being evaluated.

Clinical implications

Clinicians running MBI research trials or training programs should use the MBI-TAC with trained assessors (themselves at 'proficient' level) and pair it with qualitative feedback to ensure intervention fidelity. Competence should be assessed across a full 8-session course recording, not a single session, to account for natural variability.

Caveats

  • No empirical data, sample sizes, or clinical outcomes are reported; this is a methodological/assessment framework document.
  • Study design tag is approximate — this is a competency assessment tool manual, not a standard research study design.
  • The paper's DOI and journal metadata reference a 2026 study on adolescent mental and metabolic health, but the full text is actually the 2012 MBI-TAC manual (Crane et al., Bangor/Exeter/Oxford) — there is a mismatch between the supplied metadata and the document content. Summaries and tags reflect the actual document content (MBI-TAC tool), not an adolescent health study.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How is MBI-TAC used to assess mindfulness teacher fidelity in clinical trials?What are the key competency domains for MBSR and MBCT teachers in research settings?How does mindfulness teacher competence affect patient outcomes in MBI programs?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Mindfulness
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next