ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
When the emergency department is the only door left open
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. When the emergency department is the onl…

When the emergency department is the only door left open

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine·August 19Open Access
Emergency MedicineSafety signalHomelessnessMental Health DisorderSubstance Use DisorderCross-Sectional Survey (Point-In-Time Count)Mixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A 24-hour Point-in-Time (PiT) Count of homelessness in Edmonton, Alberta (October 10–11, 2024), using three methods—street enumeration/survey (n=860 survey respondents), observed count, and administrative count—to characterize the scope, demographics, and health burden of people experiencing homelessness.

Key findings

3,902 people were identified as experiencing homelessness—the highest count in Edmonton's history, up 55% from 2022 (2,519) and 27% above the previous record (2008, 3,079). 75–80% met criteria for chronic homelessness; 50.3% identified as Indigenous despite comprising only 6.2% of Edmonton's population. Among survey respondents, 63.9% visited an emergency room at least once in the prior year (average 5 visits/person; ~2,657 total visits), and 49.4% were hospitalized (average 16-day stay; ~6,400 total hospital days).

Study limitations

- PiT counts capture a single 24-hour snapshot and systematically undercount hidden homelessness (couch-surfing, overcrowding), which disproportionately affects women, gender-diverse individuals, and racialized groups. - Survey data rely on voluntary, self-reported responses, creating potential non-response and recall bias. - Administrative data provide only aggregate figures for gender, age, and racial identity, limiting deeper intersectional analysis.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should anticipate high ED utilization and complex, co-occurring needs (80.6% substance use, 69% mental health challenges, ~47% physical mobility issues) among patients experiencing homelessness—routine screening for housing status and warm handoffs to housing supports are warranted. The extreme overrepresentation of Indigenous peoples (50% of those enumerated vs. 6.2% of the general population) calls for culturally safe, Indigenous-led care pathways in emergency and acute settings.

Caveats

  • Sample size of 3,902 reflects total enumeration; the survey subsample is 860, and different questions had varying response denominators — aggregate statistics should be interpreted accordingly.
  • The paper title ('When the emergency department is the only door left open') suggests a framing essay or editorial context around the PiT data, but only the PiT report text was provided — the clinical commentary component, if any, is not present in the supplied text.
  • This is a community homelessness enumeration report (PiT Count), not a clinical trial or traditional research paper — the DOI links to a Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine publication, but the full text is a Homeward Trust PiT Count report, suggesting it may be a linked commentary, letter, or data report rather than an original research article; study design label may not fully apply.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What interventions reduce emergency department visits among people experiencing homelessness?How does Housing First affect health outcomes and hospital utilization in homeless populations?What culturally safe approaches improve Indigenous patient engagement in emergency care?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Sample Size
n=3,902
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next