ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Epidemiology and mortality predictors of acute poisoning in a Tunisian Emergency Department: a two-year retrospective study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Epidemiology and mortality predictors of…

Epidemiology and mortality predictors of acute poisoning in a Tunisian Emergency Department: a two-year retrospective study

African Journal of Emergency Medicine·September 18Open Access
Emergency MedicineSafety signalAcute PoisoningSelf-HarmRetrospective Cohort StudyPesticidePharmaceutical OverdoseMixedAlpha-ChloraloseAluminium Phosphide

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective single-center study at a Tunisian ED (Mahdia, Jan 2022–Jan 2024) described the epidemiology of acute poisoning in 234 patients aged ≥12 years and used multivariate logistic regression to identify clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality available at the time of ED presentation.

Key findings

Overall mortality was 12.8% (30/234); three independent predictors of death were GCS ≤8 (aOR 8.9, 95% CI 3.2–24.7), tachypnea >20/min (aOR 9.4, 95% CI 3.2–27.6), and aluminium phosphide poisoning (aOR 10.2, 95% CI 3.5–29.7), which alone carried a 68.4% case fatality rate. The model showed excellent discrimination (AUC 0.89).

Study limitations

Single-center retrospective design limits generalizability; confirmatory toxicology was obtained in only 15.8% of cases, risking misclassification; with only 30 deaths the multivariate model was capped at three predictors, leaving potential confounders unaddressed.

Clinical implications

In resource-limited EDs, two bedside findings at triage — GCS ≤8 and respiratory rate >20/min — combined with exposure to aluminium phosphide should trigger immediate ICU-level care. Stricter regulation of aluminium phosphide and integration of psychiatric liaison services into the ED could substantially reduce both mortality and repeat self-harm.

Caveats

  • 86.3% of cases were intentional self-poisoning, predominantly in young women (mean age 30); findings may not generalize to populations with different demographics or poisoning circumstances
  • Combining patients aged ≥12 years (adolescents and adults) in a single cohort may obscure important differences in intentionality, agent choice, and outcomes between age subgroups
  • Only 15.8% of cases had confirmatory toxicological testing, so toxic agent classification relied largely on clinical history and may be subject to misclassification or recall bias
Show all 4
  • The authors disclosed use of AI tools (DeepSeek and DeepL Write) for language editing; no reference list details were available for most citations in the full text

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are evidence-based management strategies for aluminium phosphide poisoning in emergency settings?How does restricting access to highly toxic pesticides affect suicide rates in low- and middle-income countries?What triage scoring tools best predict mortality from acute poisoning in resource-limited emergency departments?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
African Journal of Emergency Medicine
Sample Size
n=234
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next