ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Biomaterials in Retinal Surgery: Enginee…

Biomaterials in Retinal Surgery: Engineering the Future

American Journal of Ophthalmology·August 30
OphthalmologyPractice changingDiabetic RetinopathyGeographic AtrophyMacular Telangiectasia Type 2Retinal DetachmentNarrative ReviewAnti-VEGFEncapsulated Cell TherapyGene Therapy VectorHyaluronic Acid HydrogelRetinal ProsthesisRPE Transplant ScaffoldSustained-Release Drug DeliveryVitreous Tamponade AgentAdultPRIMARanibizumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This narrative expert review covers current and emerging biomaterials in retinal surgery across five domains: vitreous tamponade agents, retinal prostheses, RPE transplant scaffolds, intraocular drug delivery platforms, and gene therapy vectors — with original preclinical data on an oxime-crosslinked hyaluronic acid vitreous substitute evaluated in rabbits.

Key findings

The PRIMA photovoltaic subretinal implant improved visual acuity in 81% of geographic atrophy patients (26/32) at 12 months; a 44-channel suprachoroidal prosthesis had no device-related serious adverse events at 2.7 years; the authors' hyaluronic acid hydrogel showed a density of 1.01 g/mL, refractive index of 1.356, and IOP of 13.5–25.9 mmHg with preserved ERG in rabbits; 2025 saw approval of a refillable ranibizumab port delivery system for diabetic retinopathy and the first encapsulated cell therapy implant for macular telangiectasia type 2.

Study limitations

The hydrogel vitreous substitute data are preclinical (rabbit model) only; RPE scaffold trials remain in early Phase I/IIa; the review did not use systematic methodology (no PRISMA, no dual screening, no protocol registration), limiting evidence synthesis rigor.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should be aware that retinal biomaterial innovation — from subretinal implants to sustained-release drug systems — is moving from stabilization toward tissue replacement, with several recent regulatory approvals and ongoing Phase 3 gene therapy trials reshaping the treatment landscape. Long-term safety, immunogenicity of allogeneic constructs, and scalable manufacturing remain unresolved before wider clinical adoption.

Caveats

  • Sample size tag reflects the PRIMA trial cohort (n=32) cited within the review, not an overall study enrollment figure; the review itself has no single patient population.
  • The oxime-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogel data are original preclinical findings embedded within a review article, not a standalone controlled study — rabbit model results may not translate directly to humans.
  • The 'PRIMA' brand tag refers to a photovoltaic subretinal implant device, not a pharmaceutical product.
Show all 4
  • This is a narrative review without systematic methodology (no PRISMA, no pre-specified eligibility, no dual screening); evidence synthesis conclusions should be interpreted with caution.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the latest clinical outcomes for the PRIMA subretinal photovoltaic implant in geographic atrophy?How do refillable port delivery systems compare to standard intravitreal injections for anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic retinopathy?What is the current status of Phase 3 anti-VEGF gene therapy trials for retinal disease?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next