ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Regeneration and Replacement of the Corneal Endothelium: Advances in Cell Therapy, Tissue Engineering, Molecular and Pharmacologic Strategies
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Regeneration and Replacement of the Corn…

Regeneration and Replacement of the Corneal Endothelium: Advances in Cell Therapy, Tissue Engineering, Molecular and Pharmacologic Strategies

American Journal of Ophthalmology·September 17Open Access
OphthalmologyPractice changingCorneal Endothelial DysfunctionFuchs Endothelial Corneal DystrophyNarrative ReviewAntisense OligonucleotideCell TherapyCRISPR Gene EditingEndothelial KeratoplastyROCK InhibitorTissue EngineeringAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This review evaluates a broad range of emerging therapies for corneal endothelial dysfunction, including cultured donor-derived cell injection, tissue-engineered grafts, gene/RNA-targeted approaches (ASOs, CRISPR), and pharmacologic strategies (ROCK inhibitors, TCF4-directed transcriptional modulation), compared across translational maturity, scalability, and clinical role.

Key findings

Cultured donor-derived corneal endothelial cell (CEC) injection is the most clinically advanced modality—approved and in commercial use in Japan, with Phase 3 trials underway in the US; tissue-engineered endothelial grafts have reached first-in-human evaluation; TCF4-directed transcriptional modulation is in Phase 2; ROCK inhibitors have clinical-stage data; while mitochondrial transfer, extracellular vesicles, ASOs, and CRISPR remain preclinical.

Study limitations

As a narrative review, it does not perform a systematic search or meta-analysis, limiting the ability to quantify comparative efficacy across modalities. Translational maturity varies widely, and most novel strategies lack human clinical trial data.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should be aware that CEC injection therapy is now commercially available in Japan and approaching regulatory consideration in the US, offering a potential alternative to cadaveric endothelial keratoplasty. ROCK inhibitors and TCF4-directed approaches represent the nearest-term pharmacologic adjuncts, while gene-editing and organelle-transfer strategies remain experimental.

Caveats

  • Regulatory status of cell injection therapy is jurisdiction-specific (approved in Japan; Phase 3 in the US as of publication); clinicians should verify local regulatory standing before referencing for practice
  • The majority of novel strategies discussed (mitochondrial transfer, extracellular vesicles, ASOs, CRISPR) have no human clinical trial data yet, limiting immediate clinical applicability
  • This is a narrative review without systematic search methodology; conclusions on comparative efficacy reflect expert synthesis rather than pooled trial data

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the clinical outcomes of corneal endothelial cell injection therapy compared to DMEK?How do ROCK inhibitors promote corneal endothelial regeneration in clinical practice?What is the current status of tissue-engineered corneal endothelial grafts in human trials?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next